• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 个月前

    *and actively destroys/dismantles anything one could remotely be proud of having their tax money go to.

    I’d gladly fund NASA and scientific research any day of the week, but nooooo gotta feed the poor poor billionaires.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 个月前

      My republican coworkers are complaining about NASA because they always flake when buying our products (we sell electronic stuff to defense related military contractors) because they don’t have enough budget.

      Fucking idiots don’t realize that their political party doesn’t even want a NASA

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 个月前

    My city can’t afford housing or transit but just spent $150 million building a stadium for live nation. Free taxpayer funded stadiums for corporations to profit from, yay!

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 个月前

      “Live Nation Entertainment is composed of Live Nation, an events promoter and venue operator, and Ticketmaster, a ticket sales giant. The two companies merged in 2010 and now control an estimated 70% of the ticketing and live event venues market.”

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 个月前

      Federal taxes plus state taxes plus property taxes (if you own any) plus vehicle taxes (usually in the form of plates and fuel taxes) plus sales taxes (on anything you buy) plus who-knows-what all else.

      It adds up to a good chunk of the average working person’s paycheck.

      Edit: Forgot to add county and local taxes. For example, Cook county Illinois adds substantial sales taxes and gas taxes on top of state sales and and federal gas taxes.

      • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 个月前

        TBH Ima put Social Security in the tax section too as I doubt people under 50 are gonna collect on it.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 个月前

          Hi, disabled under 50 yo person here, my only income is SSDI, Social Security Disability Insurance.

          Don’t worry, us disabled folks are entirely used to our existence being entirely forgotten about.

          • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 个月前

            I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here. I didn’t forget and I’m not worried, I chose to not bring it up because it’s a shitty comment thread not a research paper. Generally, SSDI is not really worth bringing up on if it is taxes or not and I’d personally argue that tying someone’s ability to live disabled to their previous work is needlessly cruel.

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 个月前

              You said you doubt people under 50 collect on Social Security.

              … Disabled people do.

              Generally, SSDI is not really worth bringing up on if it is taxes or not…

              Hey I mean yeah, sure, unless its your only source of income!

              Not like I’ll become homeless and die within 3 to 6 months if taxes going toward SSDI suddenly get reclassified or rerouted or totally removed!

              Not like that’s the case for about 6.3 million Americans under the age of 65 whose only income is SSDI!

              https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/quickfacts/stat_snapshot/

              sigh

              …and I’d personally argue that tying someone’s ability to live disabled to their previous work is needlessly cruel.

              At least we agree on that.

              • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 个月前

                I’m still not sure what you’re trying to say here. I have agreed with everything you have said, you’re just really annoying about having to self insert yourself into a comment thread like you have to be the center of attention. Tell me, what happens if people under 50 now can never pull from social security for retirement? They will also face 3-6 months before homelessness and death. You immediately made it about how it’s not a tax because you’re one of those who gets to use it as opposed to pay in and never claim.

                I never once argued for the removal of SSDI, I only ever brought up how tens or hundreds of millions could face very harsh retirements. For the average American worker, social security is deducted from their pay and they might never see what you now rely on.

      • Apeman42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 个月前

        Hot take: I think any involuntary expense forced on you by your government is, essentially, a tax regardless of whether it goes into government or corporate coffers, and should be included in the discussion.

        Health insurance being the major example, given that’s paid for by taxes in civilized countries. Arguably, the insurance, gas, and maintenance on a car that many of us would happily trade for a functional public transportation system.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 个月前

        I am guessing that not too many pay over 30% then? Also that this is in brackets, so that only the amount over certain point is taxed higher?

        I am still surprised that taxes can be so high, and people require so little for it!

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 个月前

          If you earn $50-200k, they you’re in the 22-24% federal tax bracket, but probably pay 15-20% Federal income tax. Plus 7.65% payroll tax (also federal). Plus 5-10% state tax. Some cities have an income tax. But yeah: 25-35% total tax burden is pretty common for middle income people.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 个月前

          Part of the problem is that we, the people, don’t get to determine the requirements. Our elected representatives do, and wouldn’t you know it - corporations pay them off to siphon money to the richest among us and give us nothing in return. Legalized bribery is the bread and butter of American politics, it’s why things are so incredibly corrupt here and why we’re living in an oligarchy, not a democracy.

        • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 个月前

          Then after retirement and benefits it’s anywhere from 20% to 50%. I’m at about 25% just with tax, 36% with benefits and retirement.

          Depending on if your deductions are calculated correctly (you have to negotiate that with your job) you might end up getting a refund layer or have to pay, so in reality my rate is more like 30% overall. People with more expensive insurance or less tax credits and or other things on top of that are going to have it worse off.

          I make half what I would need to be able to afford buying a home in my area and be able to make mortgage payments and still have money left

        • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 个月前

          Most people are either sheep, or have given up the fight. That is why anything that requires great change either doesn’t happen, or happens only when something impactful affects them personally. ‘Look over there…Netflix!’

        • Randomocity@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 个月前

          There are also State taxes that aren’t normally differentiated from when complaining about tax rates even though they go to different places. In some states it’s pretty much the same things.

        • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 个月前

          Federal income tax rates for individuals are categorized into seven brackets: 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37%

          10%: Applies to the lowest income bracket. 12%: Applicable just above the 10% bracket, capturing more of the median incomes. 22%, 24%: These middle brackets cover a broad range, reflecting moderate to higher-income levels. 32%, 35%: Affect those with substantially higher earnings before hitting the peak rate. 37%: The top rate, reserved for the highest earners. It’s important to note that these rates apply to different portions of your income rather than the entire amount. This means that if you fall into the 24% bracket, only income within that range is taxed at 24%.

  • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 个月前

    1/3, huh? You must be a high-earning Californian or New Yorker. I don’t think anyone else pays that much.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 个月前

      In California as a single person, with only the standard deductions and not deducting anything else (no health insurance or 401k) you would have to make 210k to pay 1/3 of your salary. If you pay $100 a month in health insurance premiums and put 5% into 401k then you have to make over 275k to pay 1/3 of your salary in income tax

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 个月前

    Trump can basically print infinite amounts of dollars through the federal reserve.

    As we all know, conflicts are hella expensive and often decided by who can stay solvent longer. The fact that trump can just print dollars is extremely problematic here.

    I guess the necessary course of action would be to bring the dollar’s value to zero, and use an alternative currency instead (such as euro, canadian dollar, mexican pesos).

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 个月前

    No one in the US pays 30% income tax. Only the top 10% have to pay more than 30%…and they’re rich enough to qualify for so many tax breaks at that point, that their effective rate is less than half that.