• BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    The biggest issue for last ~8 years was that wayland was promoted as “superior” while lacking even most basic functions.

    V-Sync control? Nope. Hidpi scaling? Nope. Only in 2024 it got to the point where it’s actually usable and these features were implemented.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      Who “promoted” it as superior to X11? Pretty much everyone I watch and read said that Wayland had their problems and they are working on it, but it is the future. There are ideas and concepts that are superior to X11, but it does not mean its fleshed out. I don’t think anyone said that Wayland is superior to X11 in every aspect. Not even the most die hard fan say it. :D

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        Canonical. They had that brilliant idea of wayland-by-default in 2017.

        It was a great clusterfuck of frustration for me and other Ubuntu users

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          Fedora even switched to Wayland by default in 2016 (at least for the GNOME release). I don’t know what they were thinking. 8 to 9 years before they were already using Wayland… and it still have some “problems”. Can’t imagine what you were going through. :D

          But compared to Fedora, Ubuntu only did change temporarily to Wayland right? I mean it was not an LTS version. I installed LTS 18.04 and don’t remember anything like that by default.