I think it’s very interesting, and something i’ve been looking for for a very long time. Finally a programming language focused on efficiency
Normalize not naming new languages with a single letter.
k
y?
✉️
Unicode symbols is a good idea.
I’ll call my compiler 👷♂️and my debugger 😈.
Queue
Kyeww
Okay
lang
Where are your gods now
I’ll name my language with zero letters. Inroducing - .
It’s a single-developer personal project. What’s there to think about?
It’s too early to judge. Seems like it’s a solo dev hobby project. I wouldn’t hold my hopes up to ever see this language production ready.
There’s is already a fantastic programming language called q, you should rename yours.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_(programming_language_from_Kx_Systems)
it’s not mine🫤
Someone should still rename it, even if that someone is not you. 😅
Fun little toy, but no real usability. No library, no frameworks, no resources. Languages are platforms. They are used for all the stuff around them, not for the language itself.
Then build some libraries/frameworks?
Why?
What advantage would I have making libraries/frameworks from scratch for a solo-project by some random dev who might drop the language like a hot potato when he gets a new job?
It’s extremely immature and only has a few examples. I can’t find a reference or any real form of documentation either, though I’m sure it exists somewhere.
If you’re looking for an “efficient” programming language (you’ll probably need to define that further but I’m assuming output size and compile speed), both Go (which seems to inspire this project) and Zig come to mind.
As someone also working on a minimal programming language, I might share some of the values, but using Go as an implementation language is an immediate turnoff.
Also, not having a single code example on the linked page is super-annoying.
People need to stop that.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
␇
