They still haven’t even offered a legal theory for destroying those Venezuelan boats.

“Because I can” is the legal theory at this point.

Maga’s understanding of herd immunity is that it’s similar to how Zapp Brannigan defeated the killbots.

Like I’m a non-voting anarcho-communist and I’m absolutely not secretive about that

How embarrassing for you.

This is so wild, not even for a second could I see this coming.

No?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama

Having not learned their lesson they continue to meddle in people’s sex lives.

Oh, absolutely. But that world doesn’t exist.

So, you do some criminal shit but then if you have enough money, and the other side agrees to settle, you get off scott-free? No crime happened? Wtf?

If it were criminal there would be a prosecutor and the state would be charging Disney. Sounds like it was a civil suit seeking damages - which they got.

Ugh really? I haven’t seen that myself but that’s frustrating.

Non-containerized applications. Not in a container. It’s not complicated. Running “on bare metal” sounds cool but it’s a wildly inaccurate description. Containerized applications run on the system natively just like non-containerized applications. So if one of them runs “on bare metal” then then others do as well.

But historically “on bare metal” is used for embedded or micro-controllers where you don’t have an OS.

• Users will stop referring to non-containerized applications as “running on bare metal”

It’s a Russian friendly source, so may be believable.

Soldiers are killed on the battlefield. Kings are ransomed.

No, you’re saying I’m right.

Jesus, i friggin hate the whole “we must go all in on one direction else you go all in on the other direction” bullshit.

It’s a workman’s comp claim.

But sue for… What? I can’t imagine Disney was negligent it anything. This show has run for decades and the cast member willingly put himself in danger.

Narrator (very drunk): sigh and of course there wasn’t…

What “other technology” is going to make sure your API doesn’t have SQL injection and bad authentication vulnerabilities?

You know what? Rather than over-complicate things you can probably just check that filenames only contain a small set of white-listed chars. [a-zA-z-._] (and != ‘…’ or ‘.’) or something.

And one other nit-pick if you’re up for more code-review - your authentication logic should probably be inverted:

if !ok || user != session.config.username ||
				pass != session.config.password

I’d change that to be something like

if ok && user == session.config.username && pass == session.config.password {
   // do login
} else {
   // not auth
}

There’s a whole category of security errors where an exception in logic like that causes the code to skip the “you’re not allowed” logic and go right to the “you’re allowed!” block. It’s more of an issue with languages that support exceptions but it’s still considered a best practice generally (it’s also typically easier to read).

“Security” is not just “ssl”…