A 7/10 is basically a complete failure, so why didn’t reviewers take my feelings into account before publishing their scores?

  • rjh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This ignores subjectivity. What is a 7/10 for most gamers could easily be a 10/10 for a specific type of gamer. Rather than focusing on review scores people should focus on the niche of games that they really enjoy.

    • Shurimal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And this is why I don’t read opinions from general review/gaming sites. For example, I judged whether I’ll play Starfield purely on overviews from YouTube creators who focus on Bethesda RPG-s (Camelworks, Fudgemuppet et al) and space exploration games (Obsidian Ant). The opinions of FPS folks, Fromsoft freaks and D&D diehards is irrelevant🙃

      Or, as I’ve always said, if 2001: A Space Odyssey was made today, it would score 4/10 on IMDB and people would complain that it’s a slow slogfest with no action and boring dialogue.

    • tburkhol@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention the subjectivity of what “7” means. I’ve tallied enough judges ratings to know that some people treat 5 as average, some people treat 8 as OK, and some treat anything below 7 as failing.