• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s unavoidable to center Elon here but can we just take a step back and appreciate how stupid, bad, and completely antithetical to a usable website this idea is? blocking has been a feature on like everything since phpBB forums because it literally just works. it’s an easy way to curate your experience without escalating and it’s a logical imitation of being able to simply avoid a person in real life. the idea of removing this in favor of nothing but mutes is just goofy as fuck (and if you make muting the new “block”, what’s even the difference between them? people will just use them basically the same way!).

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s interesting to me that they made the argument that blocking is increasing server costs.

      1. How is that even possible, on a technical level?
      2. If true, how is changing to a “stronger mute” going to reduce said costs?

      I mean, it’s plainly clear that Musk has no idea what is going on at any of his companies and the narrative of him being a genius of some kind was simply that: a narrative.

      • 777@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I expect it’s accurate to say; their architecture is not like a database where you can add an index on a blocked state and then join against it. You have to get a list of potential posts that the user might want to see and then eliminate any in the block list. There will be a few edge case users who have thousands of block entries and a multithreading strategy is likely required to swiftly filter it in a reasonable timeframe.

        However, an architecture I’ve seen that works around this is to build this timeline in the background and present it to the user from a cache, I don’t know if this is what Twitter does as I never worked on that. However, if you want to not have a block feature but have some kind of mute feature anyway I don’t see how there is a meaningful difference.

        • 2deck@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, sounds like that’s the case. Funny how flaws in system architecture gets exposed to the public through vapid excuses these days.

          My guess is muting would likely result in a decrease of overall visibility. Every account gets a mute score.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        In a way, I could imagine it increasing server costs by like 0.001%, if even that, because if the algorithm finds a post to recommend but then realises it’s from a blocked account, it would have to search again (ofc it’s probably optimised so that it realises that at an earlier stage).

        But we’re talking about such small details it literally doesn’t matter and is outweighed by the functionality lost one hundredfold.

    • lemme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      logical

      Stop right there. This is Elon Musk we are talking about

    • 777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha, that’s a throwback to the days when I helped to manage a phpBB board and there were a few members that would just continuously get into arguments so I edited the database so both of them had each other on their block list. It was very telling when I discovered they unblocked each other a few weeks later and got back to arguing and derailing thread topics.

    • luna@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A worrying trend in recent social software platforms is that you can’t block people. Slack, Teams, Discord (not really, it still shows you that people you block say things, which defeats the point), so many of these garbage social platforms (… all Electron-based) don’t let you block people. Even Discourse doesn’t have a block feature. They all just assume that everyone gets along.

  • Butterbee (She/Her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what you’re saying is, if I have a Twitter account and I start blocking many MANY people it costs Elon money? Interesting.

  • UngodlyAudrey🏳️‍⚧️@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a member of a rather vulnerable minority, I had made pretty liberal use of the block feature on Twitter. Of course, I left when Musk took over and switched to Mastodon, but my account’s still there. I didn’t delete it or anything. Might have to now.

    • howmanytacos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not part of any minority, but sympathize and will be deleting my account now. However, I’m wondering if I should block everything I see first the refresh several times. Knowing that 1 cent came out of their wallet because of me sounds pretty enticing nbl

    • silly lil jester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you use Mastodon, if I may ask? I briefly registered and tried using it but it came off as highly populated with conservatives so I promptly left. :/

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow…

    Is there some kind of tech CEO competition running or something?

    “Who can alienate their user base the fastest”

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a saying, " never attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence".

      But we’re quickly reaching the point where it’s no longer easily explained incompetence. Elon is either the most incompetent person in the known universe, which is saying a lot, or he’s doing this on purpose for some reason.

      I’m not into conspiracies, but it’s starting to make more sense if he’s actively trying to tank the stock.

      • Fauxreigner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no stock to tank. You could argue that he’s trying to tank the company, but there are easier ways to do that.

        • baleygr@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could argue that he’s trying to tank the company

          I’m kinda lost here. What’s his end goal with it?

      • generalpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, 2024 isn’t that far away. It’s pretty clear who he’s pandering to in the name of “free speech” or “townsquare of the internet” or whatever shitty rationalization he uses to explains his nutty behavior.

      • norealme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once upon a time, long ago, in the very beginning, I liked Twitter as a stream of instant information from all POV. Then Twitter became a haven for bots and a propaganda tool. Is it possible that Musk bought Twitter so that he could take it to the point of absurdity and destroy it?

    • vinniep@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Money. Tech was hot and trendy, so VCs were willing to continue pouring cash into a bottomless pit of unprofitable tech platforms, and now they’re not so everyone has to figure out how to make money off of the community. In a surprise to absolutely no one that’s been paying attention, companies filled with people that have never had to be profitable before are really bad at turning their company profitable and instead only manage to light large sections of it on fire. 🤷

    • hglman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservative money thinks that they can keep there opposition off balance by smashing social networks . Musk did not launch desatitis campaign out of nowhere.

  • bizzwell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really hope platforms like Lemmy and Mastodon take off. Just the idea of no single person with control over how we all communicate and share ideas gives me hope for the future.

    • Helix@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      sadly, Mastodon currently still is pretty centralised around a few very big instances. I hope the Fediverse gets more decentralised…

      • bizzwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What does it take to facilitate this? Do individuals have the ability to help it along, or does it take more resources? I’m new to this but would like to learn.

        • Helix@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You just have to (encourage others to) register on an instance with less than, say, 1000 active users. I think that’s already taking care of most of the issue.

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think if one of them goes sour it’ll be easier for people migrate to another mastodon instance, and for that instance to grow. When Twitter goes bad, there’s not just a convenient alternative exactly-Twitter-but-run-by-different-people around the corner. But those small Mastodon instances could grow if they had an influx (to a point, and probably better so if the influx was gradual).

        Edit: especially because federation means that the people who move to the new instance can still see and interact with everyone on the old instance, so they can’t be held to the old instance merely by the presence of their friends on that instance. Unless the old instance blocks federation with wherever people start moving to, but still.

      • Chewy12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the process of taking off at best. That’s nothing compared to Twitter right now.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elongated Muskrat has discovered just how many accounts are blocking him. His ego can’t take that. His FrEeSpEeCh must be heard

    • Wrena of Delpan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m skeptical of this, maybe it’s because he’s worried his fascist followers are slowly falling into an echo chamber cause anyone with more than a few braincells blocks them

      • Sam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing makes me cringe harder than the childish nicknames everybody keeps coming up with. Elongated Muskrat isn’t funny or offensive.

  • Talmir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    So he’s run out of engineers that know how to maintain the block feature?

    • Gork@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      QA: “I’m clicking the block button but it isn’t doing anything anymore!”

      Twitter mgmt: “That’s ok, instead of fixing it we’ll just remove the button.”

    • SynapticOddity@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah! I’m a little sad how resilient these toxic media companies are. Meta, twitter, Reddit, etc are really not good for humanity. But I guess humanity has always been toxic to itself.

      • eccentricengineer@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think a large part of this is just users being complacent. As long as the platform doesn’t completely change, most users will typically just keep trudging along.

        For example if you remember the whole WhatsApp controversy from a little while ago. Pretty much my entire extended family communicated solely through WhatsApp, and they all were promising change, moving to signal, deleting fb and so forth. When the time actually came, everyone made signal accounts, and a few really switched, but to this day everyone still uses WhatsApp.

        I’d guess that as long as people’s “interests” are on the platform, they will continue to use it.

        • Spellblade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure what happened with WhatsApp, but I think the key is if the platform still mostly works as intended people will stay. I follow some artists on Twitter and my feed is mostly their content. I don’t see the trash from other parts unless I specifically go looking for it or on rare occasions. So for the most part twitter still functions the same for me and the artists I follow. Now, if say my feed was filled with bigots complaining or people harassing the artists I follow cause they draw NSFW lesbian art or the site was SO filled with bigots that it ruined your reputation just by being there then yeah I’d leave. We are approaching this point but I don’t think we are in a Voat or Ruqqus like situation. When I look at instances of games or social media platforms having a mass exodus, that seems to be the common theme, making a change that directly interferes with its core function.

  • DJDarren@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon Musk is a gaping, farting anus. I pay as much attention to the sounds from a gaping, farting anus, as I do from him.

  • styxbane@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hard pass. If I cannot block someone harassing me that’s it. Thank God I already don’t have the problem of using Twitter to begin with

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I quit Twitter after the infantile incident with Elon Musk carrying a sink around his own office. From all that we’ve seen in recent years it’s pretty clear he’s lucky to have been born rich, because he definitely isn’t the visionary we thought he was.

    • CannaVet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made my first ever Twitter account a month or two before Musk bought it, for purely NSFW reasons. I’d log in every couple weeks or whatever, handle my business, and move along. After he bought it, I said whatever I’m not doing anything useful data wise so I’ll continue my few times a month visits.

      First post-Musk visit, it’s fine. Business handled, close my incog window, move on.

      Second post-Musk visit, I log in, and it’s CP as far as the eye can see. I immediately deleted my account.

      • Marxine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Holy hell, on a serious country the government would go scorched earth on Twitter’s servers and sue tf outta Musk