• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    This but unironically.

    The court filings also show allegations that “profits from oil sales support the IRGC’s full range of malign activities, including the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery, support for terrorism and both domestic and international human rights abuses.”

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Remember Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction?

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes. Also that has no relevance here.

        Are you suggesting the Iranian government is not a hell state that deserves sanctions?

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Plenty of hell states deserve sanctions, including the US. Being a hell state isn’t a criterion for sanctions. You’re just parroting US propaganda which pretends human rights are why it applies sanctions when in reality that is the last thing on their mind.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m unaware of a pending invasion of Iran, and I think it’s about a year late for the kind of intervention I’d have liked to see.

            The Iranian government has no right to exist, and should absolutely be overthrown, though.