You must log in or register to comment.
Relating this to carbon emissions is absurd. Your phone’s maximum power consumption is about 25W, of which sensors are a tiny, minuscule fraction. Running your phone at 25W for an entire year would allow you to drive a typical petrol car doing 40mpg for 250 miles on the same energy budget.
Reducing sensor power usage is good, but not for this reason.
*gasoline or diesel. You cannot use petroleum as it needs to be refined.
Petrol and gasoline are the same thing, it’s just different terminology.
‘Petrol’ is british for gasoline. No one will be driving around on Vaseline.
— with a little help from AI.
I call nullshit.
nullshit.
As cool as it sound at a glance, I fail to see the case they’re trying to build.
And of course, they have to sprinkle a little AI on it.
I would like more something like a GPU to become normal, except it’d be an analog unit for kinds of computation vastly more efficient this way, where you don’t need determinism. Some trigonometry and signal processing, perhaps even some of 3d graphics.
Isn’t there already a special low-power part of phone chips designed to listen for wake words?
Definitly exciting for RF to me. Be it 5g, wifi, etc. Hopefully we can get hispeed proccessing for cheaper. Right now the cheapest rf proccessing 5g module ive seen promise in is the bladerf fpga.
