• Zeoic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its wonderful how they just drop the “20% is gas” part from that headline. Yes, burning gas is cheap, but it is also aweful for the environment and shouldn’t be getting considered at all… 20% of a fuck ton of power is still a shitload of power. I think that’s how those units work anyway.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fracking methane should be excluded. It’s 80 times worse for the environment than even CO2.

      • Zeoic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That was an extrapolation from where they said renewables would cover 80% in the article. I can only assume the mentioned gas would be the other 20%

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      They undersell the benefits of renewables significantly overall. This is for UK which they come out with slightly lower costs for omitting solar. They also say 5 years to build a 120mw microgrid. 1 post driller, 1 crane for support posts, with 2 workers guiding post insertion and cleaning up, 1 “wall of panels” crane lifter, with 3 workers aligning connecting panels on the ground, and then connecting wall to posts can get 40kw/hour=320kw/day. Complete in little over a year. But, in solar, 9 crews can really make a baby in 1 month.

      Microgrids don’t need permits, and utilities will give them an import connection.