I don’t watch shows anymore I just watch serpadesign feed his frogs on YouTube x

  • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They don’t care about the quality of television. Writing a story that goes on and on and offers the possibility of several spinoffs is the equivalent of micro-transactions in video games : they make more money that way.

    Capitalism only maximizes money, it doesn’t maximize quality. It eats quality to make more money.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The model worked back when episodes were self contained. I don’t need to see seasons 1-20 (or whatever they’re up to now) of The Simpsons to understand the latest episode. Old Star Trek was the same. You didn’t need a huge back story. Kirk/Picard and chums were the good guys. The guy with the plastic on his face and angry eyes was the bad guy. It was easy.

      But stretching a simple story over 10 seasons of gradually declining quality is nonsense. By their own logic we can only have a conclusion when the quality has declined to the point that nobody cares what happens. Might as well not even have an ending at that point.

      • electrorocket@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The new Star Trek, Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks, both go back to the standalone episodic model. And they are the best since DS9.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They have a DS9-style balance where there is an overarching story, but it’s usually not the focus. The Lower Deckers are now Lieutenant junior grades.