The Egyptian government has announced a ban on the wearing of the face-covering niqab in schools from the beginning of the next term on 30 September.

Education Minister Reda Hegazy made the announcement on Monday, adding that students would still have the right to choose whether to wear a headscarf, but insisted it must not cover their faces.

He also said that the child’s guardian should be aware of their choice, and that it must have been made without any outside pressure.

  • altrent2003@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can’t even write 2 sentences without contradicting yourself. It’s their choice, but their male guardian wouldn’t let them out without it?

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It should be their choice, but with guardians they’ll just grow up abused and school-less.

      • Centillionaire@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Force kids to have to go to school? That’s what western nations do. Parents get in huge trouble for not making sure their kids are in school.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not sure what the situation is in Egypt, but seems like that would be a great way to get these people to pull their daughters out of regular schools and start homeschooling them, giving them the absolute bare minimum education they can get away with, and further cut them off from the world.

          And possibly a few would go full psycho and do some honor killing bullshit “I’ll be damned if I let my daughter out of the house with her face uncovered, I’d rather kill her”

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not aware how this is in Egypt, but I grew up in Jordan and in the early 2000’s people were still sending their boys to private nice schools and their girls to crappy public schools and sometimes pull them out before they could get the national diploma (called tawjihi). I also know for a fact that a lot of the women I worked with in the same workplace were only allowed to do so because they wear hijab and it’s a teaching job with a gender-segregated teacher’s room. It’s sad, it’s heartbreaking, it should never happen, but when something like their dress code is banned from their workplace, then you’re just setting life for them on Difficult. They are vulnerable and are in more need of direct intervention and help than they are in need of a change of law.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wherever there is poverty and lack of trust in authorities, there will be a shit ton of kids out of school and unaccounted for until they slip through the cracks.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I guess being from the middle east myself and having experineced this shit firsthand, yes - it is better for them to still have access to the workplace and school. Nothing in what I said supports guardians treating their children like shit or thinking they have any way in the live sofnwomen aged 18 and above. Ultimately the problem is women having less freedom, and I don’t see how restricting that further with bans will do anyone any good.

          Problems where the symptoms are fixed will still have root causes that run deeper and deeper. If you want these women out of these horrible situations and life, this is a bad way to do it.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea, cuz they’d get more oppressed if provoked. I’m not sure if I believe in that but that’s what they’re saying.

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well that a feature if personal choice. You just ignore all the influences all the bad things that happen you make the wrong choice

    • ???@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I feel like you misread my statement. Sorry if the English was wonky (I doubt it though).

    • Raxiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My reading was they expressed concern that the guardians who imposed face coverings on these girls would deny them education rather than give up the garment, then frustration that some people, like those guardians feel they have the right to impose such rules. Seems consistent to me.