Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I’m disappointed in framework’s answer so far

  • astro_ray@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    What? I am relatively new to knowing and talking with DHH, but I have not seen anything he has said that would lend credence to what you are saying here. Furthermore these are heavy accusations. I see zero shred of evidence on the internet or revolving around Omarchy. I haven’t see a single negative thing coming out of my discourse around Omarchy. The focus is software excellence, and it is awesome.

    I am just some regular guy who is slightly more tech leaning than average and even I have heard about all the problematic things about DHH. Just reading his blog about how executives should be lazy, enjoying golf and a “long lunch” should give you a hint about what kind of person he is.

    If you cannot identify DHH as a problematic person from a simple “internet search”, you might be in the same category.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      28 days ago

      Those things are a far cry from being a nazi. Just because you see a problem with DHH doesn’t mean the majority do.