Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I’m disappointed in framework’s answer so far

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you force every person to pick a team, you may not like the result. gestures at current president

    People who are happy to not take a political stance on everything, particularly in their professional life, is good.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We have the current president because most Americans did not pick a side, and our garbage electoral system allows a plurality to win