• fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 小时前

    All of the examples are commercial products. The author doesn’t know or doesn’t realize that this is a capitalist problem. Of course, there is bloat in some open source projects. But nothing like what is described in those examples.

    And I don’t think you can avoid that if you’re a capitalist. You make money by adding features that maybe nobody wants. And you need to keep doing something new. Maintenance doesn’t make you any money.

    So this looks like AI plus capitalism.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 小时前

      You make money by adding features that maybe nobody wants

      So, um, who buys them?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 小时前

        Stockholders

        Stockholders want the products they own stock in to have AI features so they won’t be ‘left behind’

      • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 小时前

        A midlevel director who doesn’t use the tool but thinks all the features the salesperson mentioned seem cool

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 小时前

      “Open source” is not contradictory to “capitalist”, just involves a fair bit of industry alliances and\or freeloading.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 小时前

        “Open source” was literally invented to make Free software palatable to capitol.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 小时前

        It absolutely is to the majority of capitalists unless it still somehow directly benefits them monetarily