I really dislike this headline. A vulnerability was found, responsibly disclosed, and the vendor was responsive and is planning/pushing a fix. The headline drowns a successful mitigation in flowery language of controversy. The article also shows how this can happen on other vendor devices, but the headline here looks like just Framework messed up, when they’re the only vulnerable vendor with a fix in the pipeline (based on the info in the article). I really hate headline-bait journalism.
Titling choice probably fueled by their otherwise unrelated ongoing controversy, if I had to guess.
More blood for the blood god.
I have still yet to see a good argument for why anyone needs secure boot, I went to a talk about it at a conference this summer and if anything it made me like it less
The secure the boot for a good bootlicking.
Joke’s on them, I have Secure Boot OFF so I can use hibernate! 😂
