• unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll never understand how people recommend Zorin or Mint instead of the, much more Windows-like, and HUGELY supported Kubuntu or Fedora KDE.

    KDE Plasma is the way to go.

    • sbird@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Mint looks pretty Windows-like out of the box too. Both Cinnamon and KDE Plasma can be customised extensively too, which is nice. Mint is really good for beginners, very user-friendly and such. Fedora is plenty user-friendly too (and probably Kubuntu, but I haven’t used that one yet), but Mint takes it a step further in my opinion. This is coming from a Fedora user. I do agree that Mint and Zorin shouldn’t be the only options that beginners should consider. On the other hand, KDE Plasma shouldn’t be the only option either. The best way to pick distros, in my opinion, is by creating a Ventoy drive with Mint (to try out Cinnamon), Fedora Workstation (to try out GNOME), and either Fedora KDE or Kubuntu (to try out KDE). Cinnamon, GNOME, and KDE Plasma are all great in their own ways.

      Currently I am using KDE Plasma as I like the customisability, but I can see the appeal of GNOME if you want something that looks sleek and “minimal” (or if you really love padding), and Cinnamon is a bit more like Windows 10. They all have their own aesthetics (contrasty KDE vs maximally padded GNOME vs colourful Cinnamon)

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ll never understand how people recommend Zorin or Mint instead of the, much more Windows-like, and HUGELY supported Kubuntu or Fedora KDE

      I rebuilt an old Windows PC as a host for a Jellyfin server and used Mint because that’s what the guide recommended.

      Easy setup. Everything works great. So I told my friends about it. And, naturally, they went with Mint, too, because we all know that setup works.

      That’s it. That’s the only real reason why. I have a simple need and Mint got the job done.

      • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’m not saying that Mint is bad. But with Kubuntu or Fedora KDE you get more overall support, and KDE software is much more used, developed, tested and supported than Mint’s self-mantained things.

        There is a much higher chance of KDE thriving in the next 10 years than Mint.

        This is my opinion, of course. And based mostly on my subjective observations.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      100% agree. Don’t get me wrong, zorin looks nice and I’ve considered trying it a couple times. But kubuntu is where it’s at. My brother is old school though, and has a Gentoo install he keeps going, but he gets the latest plasma, kubuntu is a major release behind.

      There are options that get you latest, still on a Debian base, but it wasn’t as stable as kubuntu so I switched back.

      Linux is the only thing that will really revive an old apple product, even if it runs macos pretty well still, you can’t get any of the apps to run because they’re no longer offered, and then if you can install an old one, it auto updates to a non-functional version. (This just happened to me)

      I still can’t quit Windows entirely, visual studio is important to what I’m working on.