ekZepp@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoTech News online right nowlemmy.worldimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down125
arrow-up1516arrow-down1imageTech News online right nowlemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squareJaysyn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down2·1 year agoIt’s because the Fediverse doesn’t have investors, which is the way I want it.
minus-squareHaui@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down2·1 year agoWho wants to bet that all companies will open up instances once they get wind of it?
minus-squareSuperDuper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·1 year agoIsn’t that exactly what Facebook did with Threads?
minus-squareZak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoKind of. Threads launched without federation, and I don’t think it has enabled federation yet.
minus-squareHaui@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoI just checked. It seems they’re using activitypub as well. So yes, they‘re sort of in the ballpark with it, like kbin. So I suppose you’re right. But the others have to follow.
minus-squareFinal Remix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 year agoI honestly thought Threads was just a renamed Facebook chat for the longest time there.
It’s because the Fediverse doesn’t have investors, which is the way I want it.
Who wants to bet that all companies will open up instances once they get wind of it?
Isn’t that exactly what Facebook did with Threads?
Kind of. Threads launched without federation, and I don’t think it has enabled federation yet.
I just checked. It seems they’re using activitypub as well. So yes, they‘re sort of in the ballpark with it, like kbin. So I suppose you’re right. But the others have to follow.
I honestly thought Threads was just a renamed Facebook chat for the longest time there.