ekZepp@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoTech News online right nowlemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down125
arrow-up1516arrow-down1imageTech News online right nowlemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareJaysyn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down2·2 years agoIt’s because the Fediverse doesn’t have investors, which is the way I want it.
minus-squareHaui@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down2·2 years agoWho wants to bet that all companies will open up instances once they get wind of it?
minus-squareSuperDuper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·2 years agoIsn’t that exactly what Facebook did with Threads?
minus-squareZak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 years agoKind of. Threads launched without federation, and I don’t think it has enabled federation yet.
minus-squareHaui@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoI just checked. It seems they’re using activitypub as well. So yes, they‘re sort of in the ballpark with it, like kbin. So I suppose you’re right. But the others have to follow.
minus-squareFinal Remix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 years agoI honestly thought Threads was just a renamed Facebook chat for the longest time there.
It’s because the Fediverse doesn’t have investors, which is the way I want it.
Who wants to bet that all companies will open up instances once they get wind of it?
Isn’t that exactly what Facebook did with Threads?
Kind of. Threads launched without federation, and I don’t think it has enabled federation yet.
I just checked. It seems they’re using activitypub as well. So yes, they‘re sort of in the ballpark with it, like kbin. So I suppose you’re right. But the others have to follow.
I honestly thought Threads was just a renamed Facebook chat for the longest time there.