• melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Nice, looking forward to the day when I can get one that runs 100% locally. Not sure if it would be cost effective to hire someone to come in my home to operate the thing vs. just hiring a maid service, though.

  • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Step 1: “AI will replace human labor.”
    Step 2: “Actually, we still need a few humans to label the data.”
    Step 3: “Okay, the humans are now teleoperating the robots directly.”
    Step 4: “Wait, that’s just… labor again.”

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Børnich admitted that much of the work will be done by teleoperators in the beginning. Owners will have access to an app where they can schedule when the teleoperator can take over NEO and where they can specify the task they want the machine to do.

    Those teleoperators are gonna see a LOT of dicks.

  • Lembot_0005@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    opening doors, fetching items and turning the lights on or off

    That’s worthless.

    teleoperation

    I got rid of Microsoft, getting rid of Google and dozens of other surveillance aggregators. Why would I want this?

    The idea is dead on arrival. Except maybe for a few very specific circumstances.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      No it’s not.

      It might be to you, but there are enormous numbers of elderly and disabled people who would benefit from more assistance.

      I still wouldn’t trust a robot around them given how inherently dangerous a massive motorized contraption is, but we also shouldn’t be blind to accessibility and utility just because we don’t personally need it.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Why would I want this?

      Bold of you to assume there aren’t plenty of folks out there willing to overlook any potential privacy concerns for their very own ‘robot’ butler.

    • bluspoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Worthless? You clearly don’t have children.

      They can open doors and leave lights on, but somehow not turn off / close.

      • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There’s hydraulic devices you can attach to basically any door to make them close automatically, and a micro-radar presence-sensing light switch is maybe $100 bucks if that.

      • Lembot_0005@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        So instead of teaching your kids basic human interaction with trivial objects, you would prefer an Indian guy doing it with a teleoperated 20k chassis? Yes, my idea of parenting is vastly differs from yours :)

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t want this. I just want a robot that can fold laundry. I don’t care if it can only fold 80% of it and if it takes all day for a single basket. I’d happily pay 1-2K for it too!