“The new device is built from arrays of resistive random-access memory (RRAM) cells… The team was able to combine the speed of analog computation with the accuracy normally associated with digital processing. Crucially, the chip was manufactured using a commercial production process, meaning it could potentially be mass-produced.”

Article is based on this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    205
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It uses 1% of the energy but is still 1000x faster than our current fastest cards? Yea, I’m calling bullshit. It’s either a one off, bullshit, or the next industrial revolution.

    EDIT: Also, why do articles insist on using ##x less? You can just say it uses 1% of the energy. It’s so much easier to understand.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean it‘s like the 10th time I‘m reading about THE breakthrough in Chinese chip production on Lemmy so lets just say I‘m not holding my breath LoL.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah it’s like reading about North American battery science. Like yeah ok cool, see you in 30 years when you’re maybe production ready

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m ready for this entire category of “science blog” website to disappear. Mainstream media are bad enough at interpreting movements in science, but these shitty little websites make their entire living off of massively overblowing every little thing. Shame on OP and anyone who posts this kind of garbage.

        • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          To a billion parameter matrix inverter? Probably not too hard, maybe not at those speeds.

          To a GPU, or even just the functions used in GenAI? We don’t even know if those are possible with analog computers to begin with.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would imagine there’s a kernel of truth to it. It’s probably correct, but for one rarely used operation, or something like that. It’s not a total revolution. It’s something that could be included to speed up a very particular task. Like GPUs are much better at matrix math than the CPU, so we often have that in addition to the CPU, which can handle all tasks, but isn’t as fast for those particular ones.