slazer2au@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agoNew EU directive drop.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1458arrow-down18
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageNew EU directive drop.lemmy.worldslazer2au@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareunknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up25·16 days agoDelete nano already. Let’s make micro the standard!!
minus-squaretal@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·16 days agoed is, in fact, in the POSIX standard. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/ Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed In fact, it looks like ex and sed, both child editors of ed, are baked into the standard. No pico-family editors.
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·16 days agoNice, an analognowhere I missed!
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·16 days agoWhy should micro be the standard over nano?
minus-squareunknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·edit-216 days agoBecause nano has unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse. micro has sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.
Delete
nanoalready.Let’s make
microthe standard!!Nah,
ededis, in fact, in the POSIX standard.https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/
Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed
In fact, it looks like
exandsed, both child editors ofed, are baked into the standard. Nopico-family editors.Nice, an analognowhere I missed!
Y e s
Why should micro be the standard over nano?
Because
nanohas unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse.microhas sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.