• poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s an interesting ethical debate.

      I have a hereditary condition which passes only by the X chromosome, so should I, as a man, abort a daughter? Because now the risk is too high and I’ve elected to simply not have children. It would be great if I could fix the single swapped base pair that would otherwise cause disfigurement and life-long health problems.

      • KatakiY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah I’m always conflicted. Like eugenics is the end goal for these fascists but also… We should try to prevent hereditary defects rtct

            • Obi@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Unforeseen is pretty clear, by definition, that they’re things we wouldn’t be able to predict until they happen. I agree with the general sentiment in this thread btw, using genetics to prevent hereditary conditions or otherwise improve the human condition sounds great on paper but it’s risky business.

      • Avicenna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is why billionaires should be kept away from sciences and tech but unfortunately they are all over it. The fact that these require lot of funding does not help.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      High IQ would be sure nice, but has a large number of genes involved. Not that you need a high IQ as a farmer in a low technology future.