• assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair, we’ve manufactured a lot of parts for other country’s F35s so far. That’s quite standard for defense contracts. Still, if Saab commits to bringing more guaranteed manufacturing jobs than the F35 program, it could be worth it. If this gives us a leg up in F35 manufacturing bids, that could also be worth it. Feels like a strong play regardless of outcome.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now that the US is sending them to Saudi, how secure will they be from investigation by foreign adversaries?

    Plus, the entire supply chain system of relying on the US for software and hardware updates, having to physically send the planes to the US for maintenance, all while the US continues to talk about annexing us is completely fucking bonkers.

    Even without the annexation threats the setup would be stupid.

    I know it’s a fancy and advanced plane, but knowing how the US military industrial complex works I’m pretty sure you’re paying a high multiplier for no reason too.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        There have been no confirmed downings of F-35’s.

        While it’s fully possible that the US is lying about that, it’s equally possible that the claims from Iran are also lies, because half of military action is information and misinformation. I wouldn’t lean on foreign propaganda any more than I would domestic propaganda.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          30 days ago

          If you want a laugh, go look up the photos Iran doctored up for this bit of propaganda. I remember one had an F35 with cockpit the size of a school bus on it. Another had the tail section on backwards. Probably AI slop, but fake photos to be sure.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          There have been no confirmed downings of F-35’s.

          Several “oops this plane just fell off the flight deck, oh well, shit happens” articles in recent memory. A great way to explain why the Navy is suddenly down a vehicle without having to explain to anyone in the general public what happened.

          I wouldn’t lean on foreign propaganda any more than I would domestic propaganda.

          Americans are putting these jets into service and a surprising number of them are failing.

          Whether Iran/Yemen have successfully struck any of them or the Navy can’t get them on and off the flight deck reliably is almost a moot point. A downed plane is a downed plane.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              30 days ago

              Is this a contest to crash the most aircraft?

              Because my man, the GOAT, John “New Plane” McCain would like to have a word.

          • bobgobbler@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            Oh so this is the part where we provide no sources to our claim. Then claim the sources are unreliable!

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        I wanna remind everyone that THIS was one of the pictures Iran released to prove they shot down an F-35.

  • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Gripen is certainly not as advanced as F-35 but its operating costs per flight hour are only 1/5th of the F-35 which is definitely a big consideration when you don’t have a US-sized defense budget.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      30 days ago

      What role does the jet have to fulfill? Fight off enemy planes in an invasion? If it’s the US that invades you wouldn’t want US tech, but it doesn’t really matter, the US would win. Russia invading? At this point they’re down to kites and helium balloons, right?

      If it’s to fulfill a role within NATO, a Gripen is probably just as good as an F-35, because any enemy of NATO’s will almost certainly be many generations behind. China wouldn’t be, but neither Canada directly nor NATO is likely to get into a direct fighting war with China. Only maybe if Canada wanted to help defend Taiwan against Chinese aggression could that possibly happen. But, because Taiwan’s a small island, Canada’s Navy would probably be the main force involved.

      In a few decades, things might already have changed. Missiles and drones might have made fighter jets essentially obsolete. So, it doesn’t make too much sense to buy something that’s massively expensive just because it’s the most up-to-date thing right now.

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been commenting on a bunch of threads the best way to deal with a bully is to tell them to fuck off and go play with everyone else in the playground. Glad we’re taking the first few steps in the right direction.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      the best way to deal with a bully is to tell them to fuck off

      Works best when the bully isn’t stupid rich and surrounded by psychopath security guards.

      A big reason why oil-rich oligarchies buy American military hardware is to avoid getting the heavy end of the “regime change” stick bounced off their heads.

  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thing the article conveniently leaves out, at least one of the “retired air force officers” works at (or did, seems to be some obfuscation) Lockheed Martin.

    Of course they are against switching, they will lose their cushy lobbyist jobs.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Do it Canada! Purchase the SAAB and your pilots will have more seat time. The F-35 is a maintenance pig.

  • engene@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    It’s what happens when you harm and betray a peaceful ally. Let’s do this! 🍁