Halfway through he describes this as malicious compliance with the “right to repair” law. Apple and others are making a mockery of the law.

  • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The best (worst) example I’ve seen in recent memory has been seat warmers. BMW and other manufacturers tried forcing a subscription on people just to use the seat warmers that are (1) already present in the car, (2) already wired up with buttons in place, and (3) cause no additional outlay of effort on the part of the manufacturer once they’re installed. There’s no valid reason to charge a subscription for something like that beyond straight greed.

    • sqgl@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      It is like having a grandstand at a football stadium which costs extra to use. Do you resent that?

      Do you resent the satellite TV example I gave earlier?

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You don’t own the stadium, and you don’t own the satellite. So they’re really not the same as a car, which you do (nominally) own.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Satellite TV is a service that requires constant upkeep by the companies which costs money.

        And your football stadium is a bad analogy.