• Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love the way companies simply refuse to not track us. You guys seen those cookie popups that are like “accept and continue” or “reject and pay” where you have to actually pay to reject cookies? I cannot believe that’s legal at all. Total scumbags.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Literally baked into http is a “referrer URL” option.

      None of this is new. It’s literally built into the protocols we use daily.

      • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Very true, you’re right.

        It’s just that the sort of “depth” and “breadth” of the tracking has evolved, as well as the ways marketers use that information.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I personally have never seen a pay to reject. What types of websites have you come across that do that? I’m genuinely curious.

      • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        A lot of news sites! Let me see if I can find one.

        I’m pretty sure I saw it on Autosport earlier today. Just opened it in Chrome (ew) – see screenshot!

        1000022765

        Edit: reading the popup, I assume the legal loophole is that you technically CAN revoke consent after accepting, without paying, by visiting a whole separate page and doing it there. Ultra scummy!

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh! Ok. I was under the impression the verbiage had the word Reject in it somewhere; that’s on me. It makes much more sense now, and I get what you’re saying. Thanks for the clarification!

          • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I actually do think I’ve seen variations in this wording over the course of a few months. I’m going to go digging around sites I think are probably less scrupulous to see if I can find examples.

            Boom, gotcha. First absolute rag that came to mind. Check it! Screenshot:

            1000022766

            Edit: also it’s totally on me that you thought the word Reject was in there - I put it in quotes and then provided an example that didn’t contain it, sorry! 😂

      • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s sort of what I’m saying, though; I would have thought this would have been a violation of some of the guidelines around consent in the gdpr

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          For gdpr it has to be available for a “reasonable price” from what I remember. Facebook has gotten in trouble for this due to the high price they’re charging.