fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoJudge hands Lambo.com to Lamborghini after ruling owner acted in bad faithwww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down17
arrow-up1253arrow-down1external-linkJudge hands Lambo.com to Lamborghini after ruling owner acted in bad faithwww.techradar.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down16·8 days agoUnpopular opinion, but the judge was right. There would be zero benefit to society to reward this absolute cybersquatter. There’s an almost zero benefit to reward a corporation. Both bad, but the corporation should get it in this case.
minus-squareneon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down5·8 days agoHow is a cyber squatter worse than companies who squat on other things like money or diamonds. The man bought the domain and if lambo wants it, they can buy it from him. How long until other companies start trying to get any domain name that is part of their name now?
Unpopular opinion, but the judge was right. There would be zero benefit to society to reward this absolute cybersquatter. There’s an almost zero benefit to reward a corporation. Both bad, but the corporation should get it in this case.
How is a cyber squatter worse than companies who squat on other things like money or diamonds.
The man bought the domain and if lambo wants it, they can buy it from him.
How long until other companies start trying to get any domain name that is part of their name now?
See: Nissan.com