Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml to cats@lemmy.world · 1 year agoHistorical kitty signaturelemmy.mlimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1585arrow-down15
arrow-up1580arrow-down1imageHistorical kitty signaturelemmy.mlFacelikeapotato@lemmy.ml to cats@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareSludgehammer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up78arrow-down2·1 year agoThe funny thing is that some medieval bricklayer made a conscious choice here, he could have put that brick paw-print down and made a flawless floor. Now, here we are getting a chuckle out of some unknown bricklayer’s little gag centuries later.
minus-squaretelllos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up46arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m also wondering if those are not fake prints. They look pretty deep. I don’t think a cat walking on drying bricks would leave such deep marks. To me they look like easter eggs left by the brick layer.
minus-squareScrof@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoMaybe they’re deep because of water erosion from rains over a thousand years, those bricks look pretty polished.
minus-squareZaphod@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoI don’t think the bricks are that old. Maybe a few hundred years or so
minus-squareCitizenKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoAlso, wouldn’t water erosion make them less deep not more, due to generally smoothing the stone?
minus-squareHonoraryMancunian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoMaybe water pools in them long after it dries out on the surrounding brick, but whether still water still erodes stone I don’t know.
minus-squareGreatAlbatross@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’s possible. I have paw prints of varying size and pressure in the concrete around my house (thanks cat). The ones from super wet concrete look almost like a duck/goblin footprint, the ones in drier screed look like those tiles, but much less deep.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoAlso like, this looks like stone, not brick…
minus-squareJordan Lund@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·1 year agoAs a cat owner, this doesn’t even look like a real print. It’s too deep. Most likely a manufactured print done as a gag by whoever made the bricks.
minus-squareZellith@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·1 year agoWouldn’t he have needed to change the brick? If you flip it then it wouldn’t fit there any more since its shape is asymmetrical.
The funny thing is that some medieval bricklayer made a conscious choice here, he could have put that brick paw-print down and made a flawless floor. Now, here we are getting a chuckle out of some unknown bricklayer’s little gag centuries later.
I’m also wondering if those are not fake prints. They look pretty deep. I don’t think a cat walking on drying bricks would leave such deep marks.
To me they look like easter eggs left by the brick layer.
Maybe they’re deep because of water erosion from rains over a thousand years, those bricks look pretty polished.
I don’t think the bricks are that old. Maybe a few hundred years or so
Also, wouldn’t water erosion make them less deep not more, due to generally smoothing the stone?
Maybe water pools in them long after it dries out on the surrounding brick, but whether still water still erodes stone I don’t know.
It’s possible. I have paw prints of varying size and pressure in the concrete around my house (thanks cat).
The ones from super wet concrete look almost like a duck/goblin footprint, the ones in drier screed look like those tiles, but much less deep.
Also like, this looks like stone, not brick…
As a cat owner, this doesn’t even look like a real print. It’s too deep. Most likely a manufactured print done as a gag by whoever made the bricks.
Wouldn’t he have needed to change the brick? If you flip it then it wouldn’t fit there any more since its shape is asymmetrical.
Shhhh just let it ride