• TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yes more nukes for all! Let everyone fight over old land disputes too! If we remember the history of Afghanistan, we know that nuclear weapons were crucial in their efforts to topple the USSR and the USA!

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I think the best example here is North Korea actually. Nothing stops imperialists in their tracks better than a nuclear program, and if we want a more peaceful world, the answer is every country having a nuke as that inspires more diplomacy and cooperation.

      • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        How the fuck is it a good example? People are starving, their only real export is meth and the only countries pretending to deal with them are China and fucking russia. You seriously think that anyone considering taking over their territory would be worried that ancient soviet garbage will fly? Only reason Korea doesn’t take over is they know their country can’t survive infusion of starving, brainwashed masses that would take years to integrate into any modern society.

          • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            You’re talking about Korean War? America defended Korea from Soviet attack. You’ve got some alternative history you’re operating with?

            • 0x0@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 minutes ago

              Educate yourself, you sound like a dumb American.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_expedition_to_Korea?wprov=sfla1

              According to a National Interest article, Low’s own records indicated the punitive campaign was motivated by a need to demonstrate American power over what he considered to be a weaker nation. Previously, the American commanders had felt entitled. They would “peacefully” enter Korean waters for survey and trade aboard heavily armed warships, all the while ignoring repeated diplomatic requests to respect Korean sovereignty.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          How the fuck is it a good example?

          Maybe think about it a little before speaking.

          Also, maybe consider your delivery.

          Do you think you’re more likely to get a good response by leading off in hysterics and obscenities? Or do you think you could have led this off in a different way, such as: “I disagree for the following reasons.”

          • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            49 minutes ago

            I want to welcome you to the internet. Place is wild.

            I take it your agree it was a shit example since you didn’t provide any arguments to the opposite?