• fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my opinion - and yes I know it’s punny - fish also belongs in the “too opinionated” category.

      It’s not a bad shell but overall I found it to be quite reluctant to work the way you want it, if that isn’t the way the developer meant it to be used. Which is fine, but again, it means that fish is opinionated.

    • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I tried to learn it, but failed. Looks like I’d love to use both, but I have no idea where to start. Any suggestions?

      • prettybunnys@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It might be easiest to work backwards with starship, see how it integrates with fish then see how to run fish.

        Then install fish, add starship to it.

        99% of my usage is around how it helps me navigate the terminal, I use bash for all my scripts lmao

        • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That sounds quite good, actually. I mean, I have a gazillion bash scripts, but I can keep them. I think I don’t care about posix, or whatever it’s called, for my day-to-day navigating the shell.