There is no dogma. It would take you one day to switch. You haven’t because you’re comfortable and stubborn. Just admit that, stay on x11, and stop making yourself feel bad. You don’t have to switch.
I don’t think there is any abstract answer for this question. If you open up most modern distributions Wayland is there and the system displays windoze. Sometimes, esp with flatpaks, it displays a wrong icon. it mostly does what it’s supposed to do which is to say doesn’t make me think of it’s existence ever.
Idk if Dogma was the right word, actually it was probably the complete wrong word. I just feel like a noob again and these error messages don’t mean anything to me.
I want to like Wayland, I really do. I’m just having trouble adapting after using X11 for the last 20 years.
If anyone has any suggested reading for making the switch easier for someone who’s deeply ingrained in the X11 dogma, I’d super appreciate it.
There is no dogma. It would take you one day to switch. You haven’t because you’re comfortable and stubborn. Just admit that, stay on x11, and stop making yourself feel bad. You don’t have to switch.
I don’t think there is any abstract answer for this question. If you open up most modern distributions Wayland is there and the system displays windoze. Sometimes, esp with flatpaks, it displays a wrong icon. it mostly does what it’s supposed to do which is to say doesn’t make me think of it’s existence ever.
Idk what that means. For me, that stuff is just an implementation detail. What dogma is there?
Idk if Dogma was the right word, actually it was probably the complete wrong word. I just feel like a noob again and these error messages don’t mean anything to me.
I get that in the abstract! Even though I haven’t seen a single Wayland-related error message ever lol