cm0002@mander.xyz to Programming@programming.dev · 27 days agoWe Mass-Deployed 15-Year-Old Screen Sharing Technology and It's Actually Betterblog.helix.mlexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1163arrow-down129
arrow-up1134arrow-down1external-linkWe Mass-Deployed 15-Year-Old Screen Sharing Technology and It's Actually Betterblog.helix.mlcm0002@mander.xyz to Programming@programming.dev · 27 days agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareeco_game@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·27 days agoFrom what I read, the modern solution has smooth 60 fps, compared to 2-10 FPS with the JPEG method. Granted, that probably also factors in low network speeds, but I’d imagine you may hit a framerate cap lower than 60 when just spamming JPEGs.
minus-squareMadhuGururajan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·27 days agoyou don’t need 60 fps to read text? All you need is to stream the text directly?
From what I read, the modern solution has smooth 60 fps, compared to 2-10 FPS with the JPEG method. Granted, that probably also factors in low network speeds, but I’d imagine you may hit a framerate cap lower than 60 when just spamming JPEGs.
you don’t need 60 fps to read text? All you need is to stream the text directly?