• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The thing is those are all threats people involved in diplomacy can rationalise away as public image stuff and not take seriously. Like don’t get me wrong, it’s going to have them on alert, but it’s not a bridge burning yet.

    This is a physical act with no other interpretation. The US invaded a country and kidnapped its leader. This is a burnt bridge.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Some will, but most will see this as confirmation he will act illegally rather than just threaten to. i.e. an escalation of threat from before this happened.