I’ve got two domain names set up for work and personal email, but I’m absolutely drowning in unread emails, around 4,000. Most are those annoying notifications like “Your security code is xxx,” “Your parcel has shipped,” and requests to rate my experience.

Right now, I’ve been trying out Inbox Zero with an old Gmail account. It’s cool, but honestly feels a bit overkill and only works with Gmail and Outlook. I switched to my own domains to get away from Google in the first place!

So, I’m on the hunt for an email provider that has solid SPAM filters and can create a priority inbox without all the pesky notification clutter. Bonus points if it supports custom domains.

Any suggestions?

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Everyone suggests proton and their whole infra just makes me sus. Just because of how much they are the “go to” alternative.

    Maybe I’m paranoid. But I feel like these companies that focus on “privacy” are just not as good as we all assume.

    It’s like all the YouTube sponsored segments of “Ingogni”. It just makes me feel like these companies that sell “privacy” are just consolidating data on the people that are worried about their privacy.

    This is less a comment about proton I guess. But, incogni, is sus as fuck. Like, really, “give us all your personal info and we’ll “scrub” it from the internet, trust us.”

    Are they sharing your emails. Probably not. But I just don’t really trust anything.

    Edit: lots of strong responses. Which I appreciate. But, my comment was more “vibes” based on Proton. But I’ll take a stand on these “Ingogni” types services. I think they are sus as fuck.

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you don’t trust anything, then your only option is self-host everything,

      Is Proton perfect? Not at all. Are they better than Google? Well… if you trust the external audits (1) and external sources in general (2), then, they probably are.

      But if you don’t trust anything, then you probably don’t trust those audits either, so it’s pointless to even mention them.

      (1) https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/proton-vpns-no-logs-policy-holds-up-under-scrutiny-of-fourth-independent-audit

      (2) https://www.webpronews.com/unlocking-proton-mails-encryption-fortress-a-deep-dive-into-secure-email-mastery/

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Ingogni is super suspicious and I don’t believe what they claim to do is even possible. But to me it’s what they claim to do that makes them suspicious, and that’s and entirely different thing than what proton does, and at least proton has documented audits to back up their privacy claims. INB4 the links to articles talking about proton complying with law enforcement requests, every company does that, even respected ones like mullvad. It’s not important that they hand over information they’re legally required to, it’s important that they save as little as possible so they can hand over everything without identifying you.

      And also, any privacy conscious service is never better than your own opsec, so if you get caught because your recovery email was your apple ID, that’s on you and not them.

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Incogni feels like a product the data brokers created to double tap your data and get paid for doing it.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Hasnt Proton assisted law enforcement in freezing, locking out or providing access to some person?
        I remember that happen.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I’ve heard of locking/freezing accounts, but the only case where a person got identified (that I’ve heard of) was because the user used their apple ID mail for recovery and got identified that way from the information handed over.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Nvmd.
            What I had in memory was false.
            The provided IPs but not decrypted mails or access to the inbox.

            Besides that they also suspended inboxes.

    • mrnobody@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why would they be sus? They’re a Switzerland based company which means really good privacy laws in regards to keeping your data out of the wrong hands. They’re not going to monetize your emails or information, which is a big deal!

      Incogni, you’re right, give us your data so we know what to scrub? No thanks lol. Feels like the wrong approach lol