Greenland’s prime minister has said “we choose Denmark” before high-stakes talks at the White House as Donald Trump seeks to take control of the Arctic territory.
Amid rising tensions over the US president’s push, Jens-Frederik Nielsen on Tuesday told a joint press conference with his Danish counterpart, Mette Frederiksen, that the island would not be owned or governed by Washington.
“We are now facing a geopolitical crisis. If we have to choose between the US and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark, Nato and the EU,” Nielsen said, adding that the island’s “goal and desire is peaceful dialogue, with a focus on cooperation”.Trump’s pursuit of the island was also a matter of “international law and our right to our own country”, he said.
You do realize that the US delegates so much of its arctic capabilities to the scandinavian countries in NATO that it would be a balanced fight at least in the beginning, right?
Given America’s obvious advantages with the scale of its military resources, I thought that the fight would be easy too, but after thinking about it I’m not so sure. War is not simply a matter of having advanced weapons and lots of units.
Considering how retarded Trump’s administration is and how demoralised the most professional and loyal military personnel are, combined with civil unrest domestically… I don’t think Trump can execute a successful invasion of another country without losing everything. More competent administrations (barely more*) have started wars and it cost them dearly in the ballot box.
You can have the best jets and ships and missiles, but if the personnel operating them think you are a pedophile and a traitor, giving illegal orders through a compromised chain of command… how effective do you think they will be in a theater of war?
Let’s hope we never find out.
I mean you just need to look at all the wars the USA has lost against much weaker countries. Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, just to mention a few.
And the only wars they actually won in the more modern times were with the help of EU NATO allies.
They can’t do shit on their own. They’re only good at “strike and run away” operations, like the one in Venezuela.
How is that AT ALL relevant to what I said? Why are you discussing something that will literally never happen? The capitalist that own America also own Europe. That’s why your politicians are such subservient losers just like ours are. They are owned by the same interests. They’re just consolidating that ownership and making the lines clear. That’s all the Greenland play is. It’s to put your politicians in their place and ensuring they bend the knee to the fascist powers.
Those same capitalists writing GDPR and Digital services act both in EU and US?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
If the EU would care they would use Mastodon and not X.
GDPR made it more difficult to create a commercial competitor for X and Facebook.
Just don’t talk like you have a crystal ball, you people with your pseudointellectual cynicism have been very wrong before, multiple times.
So you think that there would be actual armed resistance to American invasion of Greenland? Like, I want to be clear. You’re that dumb?
I’m sorry. I write my comments for people with some form of intelligence. When I said “America just invades” I wrote that with the assumption that my reader had at least a minimal understanding of geopolitics. That this would just be literal a symbolic lowering and raising of the flag. Because no one is gonna die for Greenland mate.
Are you? Are you gonna volunteer? Go ask any European that same question. Ask them if they want to go defend Greenland and die for it.
I didn’t think there would actually be someone dumb enough to think there would be any meaningful form of armed conflict.
I don’t think there’s a need to be this condescending.
When Russia started the big invasion of Ukraine, the first thing I said in the morning was “fuck”. The second was “well, at least it will be over in a couple of days”. Because of course it will be, Russia is 4 times the population, has a bigger industrial base, a significant technological advantage, a giant land border with plenty of logistical connections, and nobody has given Ukraine any material support during the Crimea thing. And yet we’re coming up to the end of the fourth year of war with no end in sight for now. Plenty of europeans volunteered to help, some of them were nazis who wanted to kill russians, for sure, but not all of them.
And remember that Ukraine was barely considered Europe at that point, it’s still not in the EU or NATO.
So while I also think the most likely outcome is either a “sale” of some kind, or a bloodless 1-day “special military operation” and strong-worded letters, I won’t dismiss other possibilities straight out of the gate.
It will definitely speed up Europe’s decoupling from the US, and the only viable alternative partner is China, which would be a massive win for European communist and socialist parties. In the long term it will also speed up the destruction of the US empire’s power, which is a massive win for proletariat everywhere.
But afterwards. Ukraine was prepared.
This won’t happen. Ukraine happened to split Europe from Russia.
China would make Europe reconcile with Russia.
The US won’t take Greenland if the EU would turn to China.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard
Greenland also has plenty of guns, the natives are very accustomed to cold and snow, and the people there increasingly hate the US. The logistics would also be difficult for the US because they don’t have a land border. If Greenlanders decide to fight back, and Europe backs them up even the same amount as Ukraine, it might be a long and bloody affair for the US. You don’t actually need advanced military tech to fight imperialist invaders from afar on your home turf, look at Vietnam.
China is not some staunch ally of Russia, I can see why that connection is usually made, but it’s just not true. They are simply non-interventionist and will trade with whoever trades with them. China refuses to sell most military equipment or dual-use commodities to Russia, and they are Ukraine’s biggest trade partner.
Allying with China is the most logical thing for the EU as a whole to do right now. They are a predictable, reasonable, stable partner with a huge industrial base. They are also leading the world in fossil fuel alternatives for energy generation, which is urgently needed to fix the climate crisis, and is especially poignant for Europe because it needs to shake off the dependency on Russian gas.
The only reason it’s not happening right now is that EU oligarchs are scared shitless of actual socialism, because they correctly surmise that it will be the end of their dictatorship on people. US is already doing their best to force their hand, let’s hope it hastens their demise.
With the current fascists in charge I’m not so sure. They think they can replace soft, economic imperialism with sheer military might, this is what is being said verbatim by Miller and implicitly by Trump, and all their other actions point to it as well. I hope it backfires badly.
Think it through. Greenland has nowhere to hide, no way to deliver weapons and only 60,000 inhabitants.
Why would you believe anything at face value during times of hybrid war?
The US have one objective: contain China.
While it’s not as big as it looks on Mercaator-projected maps, it is still pretty huge and full of empty nothing covered in snow. There is plenty of space to hide if you know how to survive.
Both of these are true, but you shouldn’t underestimate what a determined guerilla force of 30000 can do with small arms and explosives. The US won’t be able to send 2 million able-bodied men there either, it’s not the 60s anymore.
The only question is whether Greenlanders hate the US enough. For now I don’t think they do, which is why I also believe that a one-day “special military operation” is the most likely outcome.
They are not only words. Look at the massive budget cuts to propaganda ops/USAID, and the damage to supply chains and trading partnerships done by tariffs (and especially the way they were negotiated). Even the words themselves do matter, they are destroying what’s left of the so-called “rules-based order” in the minds of people around the world. They clearly gave up on soft imperialism.
Those are not mutually exclusive. The current government thinks they can contain China militarily. The general direction can be seen quite clearly. Enhance domestic oil extraction and get a reliable supply from South America as a complement (oil is the prime energy source for war, after all). Get their european vassals back in line with a show of force. Pump their asian vassals full of weapons to project power. Destroy Chinese economic influence (belt&road or otherwise) by invading/couping anyone who dares to ally with China (unless they have nukes).
I hope it doesn’t work out that way but this seems to be the plan.