• DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Something like that - I think the key is to be ambiguous, and probably euphemisms like “class-conscious populism”. I assume Zohran won the mayoral election without mentioning socialism or capitalism in his platform. What did he do without mentioning socialism?

        • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Right.

          Socialism broadly advocates for social ownership/control of production, while democratic socialism specifically seeks this within a multi-party democracy, opposing authoritarianism and aiming to empower workers, often through reforms within capitalism (social democracy) or by transitioning away from it, contrasting with state-controlled, non-democratic socialist models. The key difference is the “democratic” part: ensuring political freedom, worker voice, and using democratic processes (elections, unions) for change, not revolution or single-party rule

          .

          • Bad_Engineering@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yes, it is right.

            Social democracy is a broad, centre-left[1] to left-wing[2] social, economic, and political ideology within the wider socialist movement[3] that supports political and economic democracy[4] and a gradualist, reformist, and democratic approach toward achieving social equality. In modern practice, social democracy has taken the form of a predominantly capitalist,[5] yet robust welfare state, with policies promoting social justice, market regulation, and a more equitable distribution of income.[5][6]