• ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There are way too many people lining up to fellate Gabe for this to be accurate.

    People might get pissed off when DRM is buggy enough for them to notice, but most gamers don’t realise that they don’t actually own a single game in their Steam library.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I take some sense of ownership over my Steam library in that I can and will immediately pirate the game with the DRM stripped out if Valve ever decides to revoke my access to it.

      On the other hand, this – and buying from a better company – is why I actively prefer GOG, even in cases when the price is higher. (But pssst, hey, Beyond a Steel Sky is $3.50 on GOG right now compared to Steam’s $35.) The fact I have to launch the Steam client to play a game I paid for is absurd, and I regret every purchase I made, like Stardew Valley Terraria, before I knew GOG existed. The main outstanding issue to me now is that GOG refuses to port its Galaxy client to Linux.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam games do not need DRM to be sold there - the publishers chose to have it if it exists. Many can be run from the .exe without going through Steam.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most games on Steam are DRM-free and you can start them without a launcher (meaning Steam).

      So you can buy a game, download it, copy game files, refund, keep playing.