• The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      it’s got settings

      Well yeah, Librewolf is basically nothing but settings.

      Firefox settings.

      Confuses me no end when people rage against Mozilla and then recommend a product that cannot exist without Mozilla.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        A software has roughly three parts: core functionality, UI, default settings. Zen does the UI part and default settings different.

      • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Whats confusing about it? People took something that was going bad and made it good again. Thats the benefit of open source. Even if Mozilla goes closed source the already existing forks can continue

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Even if Mozilla goes closed source the already existing forks can continue

          Theoretically yes, practically no. Maintaining a secure modern web engine that’s up to date with - and a part of - setting web standards is something that costs tens of millions per year. Sometimes this even spills into the hundreds of millions.

          Random fork projects don’t have the resources to do that.