• parricc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    General strikes are illegal in the US. The people coordinating them could be arrested. Also, jobs can fire workers on the spot for participating in them, even if the workers are part of a union and the union want to participate. There are no protections for this. Not to mention, national guards have been sent in to shut down general strikes in the past. There’s a reason they never happen. The likelihood of one ever succeeding is highly unlikely considering the current situation. Doing it multiple days? You realize most people live paycheck to paycheck? Nobody wants to tell their kids they’re going to be homeless.

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You realize most people live paycheck to paycheck?

      Yes, that’s why it takes months to organize a normal strike, let alone a general strike. A one day strike isn’t a stike, it’s a protest.

      • parricc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The difficult thing is people need to organize it outside of work. If management gets wind of that kind of stuff, they can fire and replace any workers they know are participating long before it actually happens.

        • teft@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          That’s highly illegal if we’re going by the NLRA.

          Now whether those companies get a wrist slap for firing people in today’s political climate? That’s a different question entirely but firing someone for striking or organizing a strike has been illegal for almost a century.

          • parricc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            In a right to work state, they don’t need to give a reason. Any rules against firings are pretty much unenforceable, and the company is considered innocent unless proven guilty.

            • elephantium@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Right to work laws make it so workers in a union shop don’t need to join the union.

              Are you thinking of at-will employment? It’s a common mixup.

              • parricc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                While that’s true, every state except for Montana has at-will employment. Despite that, unions often negotiate contract requirements that effectively guarantee job security. But if you live in a right to work state, chances are there isn’t even an option to join a union at your job, giving you no means of collective bargaining.

                • elephantium@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Doing a quick search…looks like about half the states are “right to work” ones.

                  And…well, I don’t live in a ‘right to work’ state, but I couldn’t join a union either way. There aren’t many unions in my line of work.

                  • parricc@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Eesh. Guess the rainbow isn’t anywhere in America, huh? I mean, it was at one time, but that was pre-1492. Hopefully some day it will change for the better.

            • teft@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              They don’t need to give a reason but if a company fires someone who is organizing a strike and that person has been a decent employee then the labor board is going to side with the person, not the company since it’s obvious why they were fired. Amazon keeps getting in trouble for this exact thing. Which is why amazon et al are trying to get the NLRB dismantled.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      General strikes are illegal in the US.

      It’s not illegal to strike on a date with other people. It’s illegal for unions to call for a “general strike” because it’s considered them calling a strike on behalf of other non-union employees for other businesses.

      Also, jobs can fire workers on the spot for participating in them

      Not always, (though yes, it would probably be likely for many people) since they can use things like sick/vacation days conveniently timed right, or if they’re backed up by a union, they might have a contract that helps to prevent at-will firing without certain specific causes, excluding striking.

      However, if enough people strike, it’s kind of hard to enforce coming into work via firings, as it’s similar to if an entire unionized company goes on strike. What are you gonna do? Fire every single worker and shut down for good the next day because the only person running every single operation is the remaining CEO?

      even if the workers are part of a union and the union want to participate.

      As long as the union doesn’t say “this is a general strike” and just says “we are striking on this date for better working conditions”, and that date happens to be the same day other unions are striking, it’s legal. There is no law preventing different unions from striking on the same dates, and it would take very long for any legal process to try and make that claim before the strike has already occurred.

      national guards have been sent in to shut down general strikes in the past.

      This is the most likely outcome in my opinion. However, it’s still kind of hard to actually enforce the end of a general strike. It’s one thing to arrest someone, or to stop them from doing a given thing, but it’s another to forcibly remove people from their homes and make them work no matter their condition or reason.

      Essentially, I’m saying it’d be messy.

      Doing it multiple days? You realize most people live paycheck to paycheck? Nobody wants to tell their kids they’re going to be homeless.

      This is the biggest hurdle, though there is a degree to which it can be mitigated, at least for a little while. For example, there are a lot of people with backyard and community gardens, small businesses with stockpiles that are willing to support their community as we’ve seen with the current situation in Minnesota, not to mention that if the situation got bad enough you’d probably just see people stealing from their nearest billionaire-owned store because fuck it, why not screw them over more?

      To clarify, I’m not like, disputing your actual overarching thesis here, or saying a general strike is easy or likely to succeed, I’m just saying it’s not entirely impossible :)

      • parricc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        By all means, people should try. Not saying people shouldn’t. The mountain to overcome fascism isn’t going to get any smaller as we dive deeper into it. And a strike wouldn’t even have to happen in every area or even every state. It just has to happen enough to shut stuff down across the US. I just worry that most things tend to start out small and grow with time. For all of the reasons I stated, this can’t start out small. It has to start loud and strong. If it starts out small, it will get crushed in a way that scares people away from trying again.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You realize most people live paycheck to paycheck? Nobody wants to tell their kids they’re going to be homeless.

      People have to realize the alternative is having their kids growing up in a fascist regime, where they can be murdered on the streets without consequences simply because some “regime official” is having a bad day.

      I am not saying it’s easy but it also won’t get any more easier when people don’t act now. In the end stage people trying to resist the regime will be insta killed or worse. Now you can still talk to like minded people and organize. Tell them you want to strike but are afraid of the consequences, maybe they will offer help.

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Going homeless at the same time as many others opens the possibility to make communities helping each other out (food, protection, communication).

      I know, it is wishful thinking, but building such communities in a peaceful way during a general strike with enough time is better than a sudden brutal civil war scenario, I think.

      You won’t get food easy if you have to fear getting shot as soon as you leave your house and they can’t run companies efficiently only with AI and MAGA workers.