• IronBird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    news networks have been doing this same pretty much since they’ve existed

    • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, news networks are not algorithmically curating content specifically for each individual person, based on personal traits that they record based on usage.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes they are. That’s what Fox news does. It curates content specifically for their wacky users.

        Whether they use an “algorithm” or not is a meaningless difference based on luddism.

        • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Fox is curating content for their viewer base as a whole.

          Corporate social media is targeting each individual user based on their identity and preferences.

          While similar, they are not the same.

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Humans have been killing each other as long as we’ve existed isn’t an argument to avoid trying to make it happen less

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Murder =/= social media.

        It’s pretty sad that I have to say this. People are really losing their minds of this “social media” hype.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        just saying billionaires manipulating shit has been the norm for ages, which is why we used to have media-ownership limits…repealed under Clinton iirc

        • pipi1234@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Agreed, but now they have tools that enable them to do it with unprecedented impact.

          In my opinion, the difference is so huge, we might as well think they didn’t manipulate things at all before.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Agreed, but now they have tools that enable them to do it with unprecedented impact.

            Yes tools like TikTok that libs lobbied to hand to fascists. Now they want more of the same.

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, by memory Rupert Murdoch had his hand at that and in Aus and the UK. I’d love to see that reined in again too