• raicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    no source code

    no paper

    no open protocol definition

    full of emojis

    LMAO

  • pimpampoom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I am sorry but this is so clearly vibe coded and lazily, i would not trust the security of that thing one second…

    • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Not too different vs IPFS, essentially the IPFS network if it was using WebTorrent. Both rely on swarms of p2p users/servers to seed/pin data to keep it online.

      I’m not too familiar with Veilid but that does seem different since it’s built for privacy so I doubt all the peers are public in that scenario. There is nothing private about IPFS or WebTorrent, all peer IP addresses are public in their respective swarms.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    A question: can you modify the site (edit its content etc.) once it’s published?

    Because the uses for a never-changing site are quite limited.

    • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not really. Decentralized does not mean anonymous… and I doubt people sharing that type of content are doing it publicly with their public IP addresses.

      Looks like PeerWeb uses WebTorrent - so that means every single IP address serving the website is easily found in the peer list of the torrent swarm. Nothing anonymous about this.