• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9日前

    The only market for 8k is movie theaters and megatrons. It’s absolutely not necessary to have it in your tv in your house. And it’s also insanely expensive to get the proper hardware to drive it at full resolution.

      • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8日前

        IMAX has a laser thing that renders in 4K, but the point still stands. 1080p is good enough for me, and cinema once a year to have fun with friends.

        The automatic HDR on my TV was a revolution because it changed the picture. 4K changes nothing.

        It’s not like we went from black-and-white to color TV, it’s like “here are way more pixels but most people don’t care because they talk and drink during the movie.” Movie nerds may care and it’s fine, but I can’t justify buying a new TV for that.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8日前

      Even there it’s wasted. There is just no place between pixel density, size and distance for anythng much over 4k. Humans can only see that sharp. Except maybe video walls, where you don’t see the whole image at once.