• Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I never said that I was a liberal. If anything, I consider myself a market socialist since anything needed to survive shouldn’t be comdified for capital.

    I’m simply saying that giving one man absolute power whether it be political or through wealth will inevitably lead to corruption. After all, the meme states that tankies are “always right”, and I’m assuming that by tankie they mean the authoritarian left like Stalinism, Maoism, etc.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Here is a declassified internal CIA memo from 1956 that literally says Stalin did not have absolute power and people who think he did don’t understand the Soviet system

      The idea that socialist heads of state are kings is ludicrous and ahistorical, a product of western movies and TV during and after the red scares

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m simply saying that giving one man absolute power whether it be political

      This is standard anti-communist propaganda that unfortunately happens to work on gullible people. It’s related to medieval era witch hunting, where you:

      1. Create a legend of a supremely evil / nefarious thing, you want to demonize. IE the devil, leaders of revolutionary movements like Robespierre, Stalin, Castro, Mao, Kim Il-Sung, etc.
      2. Claim that all people are under the dominion of this sole power, which removes their humanity, and ability to reason or think like you do.
      3. Carry out societal-wide demonization and extermination campaigns, to terrorize any potential sympathizers.

      Its a really effective tactic that lets you blame a single entity, encourages conformity and intentional ignorance, lets westerners ignore the functioning democracies of socialist states, and the mass movements that supported these various leaders.

    • Revolutionary_Apples@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Market” Socialism is not necessary. Socialism pursues a dictatorship of the proletariat, not the total eradication of the bourgeoise. This means that socialism has to have some form of private ownership and thus some form of market.