“Teleporting quantum information is now a practical reality,” asserts Deutsche Telekom. The firm’s T‑Labs used commercially available Qunnect hardware to demo quantum teleportation over 30km of live, commercial Berlin fiber, running alongside classical internet traffic. In an email to Tom’s Hardware, Deutsche Telekom’s PR folks said that Cisco also ran the same hardware and demo process to connect data centers in NYC.

  • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    As someone who also doesn’t fully understand quantum entanglement… is it that when two particles are entangled and far apart, when we observe them they will always be in the same state? Is there any way to manipulate that state? If so, it seems like it would be pretty straight forward to use it for faster than light communications.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yep

      The thing is if it’s entangled, why is there a fiber cable?

      If it’s teleportation, why is there a cable?

      However what actually makes consciousness in a brain is (hypothetically, technically) microtubules forming a very tiny cable inside of which quantum superposition is able to be maintained while we are conscious. When even brief quantum entanglement used to be insanely hard anywhere and an environment like the brain considered impossible.

      Like, it’s hard to tell what really happened from OPs article. But there should be much better articles explaining it, and this could actually end up being crazy important. Like, 20-30 years from now this might be how we finally get a real AI.

      Quick edit:

      Like, rather than one straight line to send data, if this can maintain even just entanglement in a simple fiber optic cable…

      Then that’s huge.

      If they just stretched a string between two containment chambers that each have an entangled particle, then what purpose is the string even serving?

          • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Thanks, that’s an interesting read. Still stand by my opinion that your statement is overly confident in explaining consciousness.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Penrose published a book on it in 1989.

              For literal decades the only thing that ruled it out was the ability for quantum entanglement in the brain. Less than 2 years ago we proved not only was that possible, but quantum super position could be sustained for as long as we’re awake.

              It’s a pretty safe time to be confident, even without accounting for Penrose being the literal smartest person on the planet.

              Like, I’m not big on “appeals to authority” but if Sir Roger Penrose spends 37 years saying something is true, and just continually gets proven more right over the decades…

              It’s not as far reaching as you seem to believe.

              Like, gravity is just a theory too, shit is harder than people realize it is to prove.

              • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                not a big fan of 'appeal to authority ’

                Literally glazing the guy sloppy style and basing their whole world view on a single random dude. Sorry, on ‘the smartest guy in the planert’.

                Gravity is just a theory

                Ah I see the problem. I opened a thread with the word ‘quantum’ on it. Lmao

              • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I think you’re doing your argument a disservice by comparing it to theory of gravity. But I do appreciate learning about this hypothesis and that there is actual experimentation going on. Thanks again for sharing.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I think you’re doing your argument a disservice by comparing it to theory of gravity

                  That’s not a direct comparison…

                  It’s the generic comparison to show that “just a theory” includes thing we understand 99.9999% of and definitely exists

                  Until we know absolutely everything, it’s still a theory

                  But we don’t have to believe in gravity for it to be real

                  The point is:

                  Just a theory

                  Doesn’t mean as much as what people think when they say it

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        My non scientific intuitive guess is that the cable is there to reliably create the entanglement conditions.