• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If your banking app does not work, use your banking website. If your banking doesn’t allow you to use their website, switch banks, because that means they don’t give a fuck about you, and probably want to make you use their app, because it has trackers in it.

    You are not the first one to ask this, and you won’t be the last, but I am so damn sick of people asking, will my fucking banking app work? Fuck your fucking banking app. Why are people so willing to compromise their security for a fucking banking app?

    Nothing personal against you, by the way.

    • LeapSecond@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No bank gives a fuck about you. You are right but just for perspective, banks here use their app for 2fa with the only other option being sms (which doesn’t even work half the time) and which bank you use is pretty much dictated by your employer. Banks aren’t even that bad as some countries require an app for gov id which may or may not work on grapheneos.

      This is a regulation problem, it’s not going away. The most a user can do is keep a second phone with android just for verification. I really wish we could just move to yubikeys at this point.

    • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If your banking doesn’t allow you to use their website, switch banks, because that means they don’t give a fuck about you

      I just did that and it’s so simple

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Your bank does not need to use the app trackers to spy on you. They already know everything important there is about you.

      What the banks are worried about is fraud. Fraud costs them money. But the thing is, the app development cycles are long and complicated, and instead of a pragmatic approach, they just bolt on more and more obscure non deterministic authentication schemes and heuristic checks. That’s why the app wants to know things like your location and access to the list of other installed apps, and simple username and password are not enough to let you through anymore.

      The device attestation for them is probably just another checkbox to tick on the list of “at least we tried”. Regardles of whether it’s actually relevant for security. As long as it saves them more money that it costs them, there’s no reason to not enable it.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The EU has standards for security and banks require you to use a phone, and the banks don’t give a fuck about outliers.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s BS i’m in the EU and i can use homebanking.
        Also most banks here still use SMS verification, so much for security.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Then just get yourself a really fucking cheap secondary phone that you only turn on when you need to verify your banking. And that’s it. That way you can still verify your bank shit, but the spyware doesn’t get to have always on access to your primary device.