fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1506arrow-down16
arrow-up1500arrow-down1external-linkArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squareZarxrax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39·2 days agoI mean they fired the guy, and the guy took full responsibility for the errors. If that’s not blaming the journalist, I don’t know what is.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down37·2 days agoTbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title mentions “controversy.” Also are people so lazy they can’t make up their own fake quotes? Was AI really needed here?
minus-squareprotist@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·2 days ago Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title… Say no more. Please
minus-squareKhanzarate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 days agoAre people so lazy they can’t even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would’ve been useful here to generate its own defense.
minus-squarebrambc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 days agoBeing too lazy to read is one thing, not being too lazy to then comment is a whole other kind of existence.
I mean they fired the guy, and the guy took full responsibility for the errors. If that’s not blaming the journalist, I don’t know what is.
Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title mentions “controversy.” Also are people so lazy they can’t make up their own fake quotes? Was AI really needed here?
Say no more. Please
Are people so lazy they can’t even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would’ve been useful here to generate its own defense.
Being too lazy to read is one thing, not being too lazy to then comment is a whole other kind of existence.
JFC RTFM