Following in the footsteps of Hashicorp, Hudson, etc. Zed has chosen to cash in the good will of its now substantial user base and start going to full corporate enshittification. Among other things like minimum age nonsense, they have also added binding mandatory opt-OUT arbitration.

I find such agreements very troubling, because it gives up public funded dispute resolution for private which nearly unanimously benefits larger entities, it lowers transparency to near zero, and eliminates the abilities to act as a class and to appeal. But I worry most will just accept it, as is the norm.

You can however opt out by emailing arbitration-opt-out@zed.dev with full legal name, the email address associated with your account, and a statement that you want to opt out.

I’ll just consider my days of advocating for Zed as an interesting new editor over and go back to Neovim bliss.

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I find such agreements very troubling, because it gives up public funded dispute resolution for private which nearly unanimously benefits larger entities

    For starters, check if that term is valid in your country’s legislation. Where I am for example, no contract with a foreign entity can legally retract your rights of legal representation, so any ToS you agree to that have this clause would be automatically considered invalid and you can happily eg.: start a class action lawsuit (with other users in your country).

    (tbf, in my country ToS are not even considered legal contracts in the first place so we’re somewhat better than that, but still I do get that other countries are ~*Worse*~)

    • theherk@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Agreed and I have domicile in a country that provides improved, though not perfect, protections. But it still tempers my views of the organization.