• Graymouzer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    How can anyone upgrade to a new PC when there is no Ram or hard disks available? This is a crazy time to try to push that.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    It’s not clear whether Windows 12 will welcome any non-NPU processors. More likely, PCs that don’t meet its system requirements will lose some functionality.

    They will lose some functionality, only if we accept that the slop features meet the definition of what makes a piece of functionality. They seem to not function quite a lot still.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Hopefully, SteamOS Desktop will be in the wild and shaked off any teething issues. I want to switch to an OS that is suitable for a power-casual. If it looks like a 2nd American Civil War or WW3 is on, I might switch early to Cachy.

  • DokiDokiCT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ll take this as a sign to continue converting as many of my friends and family to whichever Linux distro fits them best.

    • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honest question. As someone who has used and loved MacOS for many years, what would be the best Linux distro for me?

      • BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 minutes ago

        For a new user, the most important things are usually a familiar feeling desktop environment, comprehensive default hardware support, and plenty of documentation in case you need it. The most important anti-things are needing to learn a bunch of new concepts right away, needing to use the command line, and experimental things that are known to break regularly.

        Since you’re a Mac user, I would suggest KDE over Gnome for a desktop environment. Even though the default Gnome application bar looks very Mac-like and the default bar on KDE looks very windows-like, the rest of the KDE desktop feels much more Mac-like.

        For the rest, you will want to use a common distro with a wide user base and a long history targeted at desktop users.

        For those reasons, I would suggest either Kubuntu, or Fedora KDE.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        If you’re used to the UI and UX of Mac OS and not Windows then almost any distro will be rough. There’s Elementary OS that at surface level looks like Mac OS, but then you use the actual Linux programs and they’re just Linux programs.

      • sploosh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Stick with MacOS, Apple isn’t shitting the bed nearly as hard as MS(lop). If you really want to switch, Mint is nice as a starter, and Bazzite, while intended for gaming, is mich, much more solid than I expected and is totally usable as a daily driver.

        • scala@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          Been using bazzite nearly a year now. I also have mint installed thinking bazzite wouldn’t be a great daily. I was proven wrong. Bazzite is great.

      • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I would sugest debian, it has the same “just works”-feel to it, and the gnome desktop environment shares some design philosophy with macos. The main downside is that it is often a couple of years behind on software updates. Is this is a dealbreaker, I recommend mint for all, fedora when you need redhat-only software and debian-sid if you feel adventurous.

        All that said, if you have a good mac currently, it has the same UNIX-benefits as linux. Using “homebrew” as a package manager and “better touch tool” for the desktop tweaks solves most problems, this is what I do. You may of course want to run linux only software, if this is you then double check if you also need an x86-64 cpu (as opposed to arm) before reinstalling.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So is Mint still the easiest distro? I think I’m switching for good this time.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I went from 10 to Mint back in January.

      Pretty easy switchover. Very few issues. As a lifelong Windows user, installing apps, keeping everything updated and backed up could not be easier. Only issue I ran into during install was my WiFi device would not show up. Had to turn off fast boot and then power cycle the system and literally pull the plug to completely reset the adapter. Other than that, everything worked perfectly “out of the box”. No fucked up driver install process. No hour long updates. It literally worked perfectly within minutes. All the shit I went through with every single Windows install honestly feels like a cruel fucking joke right now when I type it out.

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Probably? There are others that might be a tiny bit easier but have less active communities, so I’d still say Mint.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      For consumer grade yes, I look forward to seeing more people choose anything else (even Apple). For enterprise, lol, they have every Dell or HP house in the world by the balls. Atleast they ensured system admins have more job security (not lime that was in short supply anyway)

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The funny thing about this is that the biggest customers can’t usually just switch. If a system is set, it is set for decades, generations or the entire company lifetime.

        So microslop may start feeling part of the impact way further along the line, and wouldn’t be able to do shit about it

        • Reygle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Not you entirely- they’d just like to replace your currently functioning mind with one that can only regurgitate factual inaccuracies while continuing your subscription.

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They haven’t even gotten everyone into 11 yet. They are tossing out another OS? Seems, dare I say, sloppy.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I just want to see Windows, and so many other layered-up legacy programs, refreshed. My other example is AutoCAD for a software that’s just half-finished garbage stacked on top of older half-finished garbage for a while until it’s all on top of a program that was designed for computers from the ‘90s.

    Windows has other problems, of course, like how no matter how good their shit is they still have absolutely dogshit, anti-human behaviours, but still.

    Anyway, someone else was saying the article might not even have any real sources but I wanted to rant about this so…hurray.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Given the quality Microsoft is currently generating. No I do not want them to do this.

      We do not need more slop for the dumpster fire.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Wasn’t 10 the last windows?
    I guess they’re really pushing You’ll own nothing and be happy, soon they’ll sell TMP/SecureBoot-locked dumb terminals for the masses (with id check of course).

  • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I still have clients refusing to buy Office 365 subscriptions and insist on sticking with their old copies of Office 2016. I’d love to see how Microsoft is gonna convince those cheap fucks that this is the correct path forward. This OS is dead.

    • pnelego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      This is a very bad framing. We (as a group) need to stop ranking distros based off ease of use, and start considering actual use cases.

      For example; I would never use Arch for anything I use to make money. Rolling distros aren’t well equipped for absolute top level reliability that I’m looking for to do my job or run my servers.

      It is, however useful for people who love to experiment, want the bleeding edge of software, and are less uptime dependent.

      Furthermore, kali is built almost purely as a pen testing environment, and not for generic use.

  • krimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Good, keep killing your own OS and forcing people to alternatives.

    I love how short sighted they are.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the thing is, alternatives need to be able to cater also the tech illiterate. Otherwise we will have growing number of people that will just accept all this bullshit and eventually start to view more free systems with suspicion(after some propaganda from corporations), which might lead to pressure to limit/restrict those free systems in personal usage.

      We really need a distro that we can recommend to some grandma who can barely open their pc by themselves and which they can use easily and safely. Since most people use pc for mostly browsing and maybe printing,text editing, i think it shouldnt be too hard to make something that is easy to use since you can leave majority of functions off and mostly have to think of ease of use/automation.

      • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Windows is not a simple OS to use. The matter isn’t to make a distro simple enough for the tech-illiterate to use, but one familiar enough for their habits to still work. And given it took two years for my mother to understand the floppy icon on libreoffice save the same way as the one in Works 3.0, it’s not exactly a simple problem to solve.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I love how short sighted they are.

      That might not be the case.

      Ever since Windows 8, MS seems to be shifting the bar for what users will keep using Windows each version. This should get all but the most compliant ones out of their system.

      Next, they might have multiple time bombs in the Linux ecosystem. xz might have just been a POC.

      So what we might have here:

      1. Keep all easily surveillable people on the system and tighten the leashes.
      2. Use the multi-point security compromisations all over the Linux ecosystem at opportune moments before they are caught, robbing the users of their systems in some shape or form.
        • I feel like they might have had to speed up their plans due to the reduced control they would have from RISC V proliferation.
      3. – a. Use the opportunities from step 2 to neutralise HVTs and do whatever they want from those who become powerless (jobless/moneyless).