UAE cybercrime law means sharing images or footage of war can bring jail, prison time and deportation

A British man is among 20 people who have been charged in the United Arab Emirates under cybercrime laws in connection with filming and posting material related to Iranian attacks on the country.

The 60-year-old man, understood to be a tourist who was visiting Dubai, was charged under a law that prohibits sharing material that could disturb public security.

The case was highlighted by Detained in Dubai, an organisation that provides legal assistance to individuals in the UAE.

  • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Man I fucking hate the Guardian.

    Is there no source people can share that doesn’t force you to accept cookies or subscribe?

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          What do you mean? I must be doing something right because I click the link and get no cookie popup and can read it. Is there a paywall I’m missing?

    • jumperalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      or just use ublock and noscript? I was able to view the article without any of that. Not even sure how you use the internet without them but you do you.

      • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I have ublock but not noscript

        You said you’re able to view the article without either one? What browser do you use?

        Looks like it does in fact work on desktop but I still have trouble getting it to on mobile. I’ll experiment around with it

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There are.

      They’ll all have heavy right wing bias though. Is that what you want?

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Pretty much yes.

          Why?

          Because all the big media conglomerates are pushing right wing agenda. They don’t want/need your money that bad because they have the financial backing and those “news portals” are not a service, but a tool to spread propaganda.

          On the other hand, true independent or left leaning publications don’t have the same financial backing, thus rely on subscriptions, ads and seemingly anti-consumer approaches just to stay afloat.

          Remember: if it’s “free”, you’re the product.

          • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            PBS and Mother Jones both don’t.

            Yes they have a donate button, what they don’t have is “turn off your adblocker or subscribe to keep reading this article”

            Boh of them let you hit X on the donate and then keep reading.

            I think your assessment is wrong.