• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Nothing is free. All free services are using your data somehow.

    If you’re not the customer, you’re the product.

    In this case, it was mostly children’s data.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you’re not the customer, you’re the product.

      Except most free and open-source software, major open knowledge bases, literally the social media service you’re using to communicate this point right now…

      While understandable when talking about services by for-profit corporations, this talking point without that context is oversimplified to the point of being obnoxious in a world where I can set up a desktop OS with a fully featured environment and software suite then go browse a social media site where at no stage was anything free where I was the product.


      Edit: Moreover, an arguably worse problem with this saying in 2026 is that it implies (doesn’t outright state, but implies to an uninformed reader) that paid services can save them from this, which these days is almost universally untrue.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I didn’t think I needed to make clear I meant with for profit companies like Nintendo.

      • redhat421@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, revised version:

        If you’re not paying you’re the product. If you are paying you’re still the product and paying for the privilege*.

        • Except for not for profit software / platforms.

        Humm, that’s not as pithy.

      • shads@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you are forgetting that Niantic made a lot of money off Pokémon GO, not ALL the money, ergo its an abject failure under capitalism and they need to pump up those numbers.

        If they had been making ALL the money they might have been satisfied, for a quarter. Then they would have packaged and sold all that data for more than ALL the money.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, but many players don’t pay, especially the huge player bases of children. They can subsidise that by selling your data.

      • Brownboy13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        While the admins and donations make it free, I guarantee there’s at least a few corporations or government organizations out there scraping the fediverse to gather data. So even though the people hosting it might not have any bad intentions, an open platform like this will still feed the data hungry machine.

        • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          scraping the fediverse

          Saturday I was looking up bottles and raftvr, one of the links brought me back to LEMMY!!!

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Again, I meant for profit companies, like Nintendo.

        Volunteer led orgs are different. Particularly those run by socialists.

        e: most volunteer/socialist orgs don’t have ‘customers’.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even if the data comes from kids, it’s not identifiable or personal. It could loosely fall under unpaid child labour if the in-game task is actually just a job in disguise.