• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      132
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh no! The video is black for a few seconds instead of showing several ads for a minute! Whatever am I going to do???

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        92
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even if they keep the screen black for 30 second to a minute, I’d still gladly wait in silence than be subjected to advertisements.

        If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I’ll just leave the platform. I have no loyalty to YouTube and I’ll sooner dump the platform and move on to other video sites than deal with enshittification and ads.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m fine with waiting 10 seconds at the beginning of a video. I wonder how much YouTube would save (by reducing bandwidth, smaller caches, choosing slower storage) if they didn’t have the goal to start the video virtually immediately.

      • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        That feature isn’t built into YT? I have it set on my browser to where the video needs to be manually started (excluding playlists).

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          My point was: You don’t need to wait for it to buffer or even load. Once the page is there, the video is playable.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Very well knowing why and watching them do their stalling is indeed fine.
      Every time you are reminded how petty they are.

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was happy to pay for YT Premium when there was a loophole so you could sign up from a far cheaper country. I paid about £6 a month for the family plan, purely so I could watch on Apple TV without having to tolerate adverts.

      Then they closed the loophole, shitcanned our premium, and demanded £20 for the same experience. We had Netflix at the time, which was cheaper. So I made a little app as a frontend for yt-dlp, and downloaded what I wanted to watch into my Jellyfin server.

      Fuck Google.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll never understand why people are proud to waste their life watching ads. Or are proud to use adblock and steal the content being posted by small creators. You’re really sticking it to the little guy, great job.

  • OR3X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The people saying “just pay for premium” don’t seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads. When google purchased it they promised to keep it that way. Then they slowly started with ads. At first they were pretty unobtrusive banners, then a short skippable preroll then multiple preroll then unskippable preroll. The reason I refuse to pay for premium is because Google created this issue and is now selling the solution. I refuse to be a part of that. It has nothing to do with the creators.

    • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The cost of hosting YouTube itself doesn’t pay for itself unfortunately. They could get away with it back then because the internet itself wasn’t that big. Therefore, we need to KICK THE NORMIES OUT OF OUR INTERNET. WE WERE HERE FIRST, REEEEEE

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would totally pay for youtube if it was even remotely decently priced.

      You can get multiple concurrents on disney+, Hulu or Netflix with blockbuster content for the same price as youtube’s slop filled premium family.

      Seriously, the service is worth maybe $9 a month. I don’t want their music, i won’t use it, the quality is crap.

    • mlc894@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I don’t think this is as simple as “they’re too young to know”! I’m a 30+ year old man, and I was around 15 when YouTube first came out. I was a huge fan of the early days, when YouTube was free!

      I am absolutely fine with paying a monthly/annual fee for ad-free access to perhaps the best compilation of human knowledge and entertainment which has ever been compiled in one place. One reason I’m cool with it is that premium views pay the content creator more than the equivalent ad view.

      Sure, YouTube “created the issue” of ads. But if it means supporting the creators and removing a barrier to videos, I’m fine with the price.

  • Xylight‮@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re eventually gonna start banning accounts for this and then requiring login to view YouTube.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do they think they are essential and believe I will not simply forget they ever existed?
      May very well be, but that will be in line with their out of touch and deluded policies.

      • r3plic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I do not agree with their changes & policies but I think you underestimate the market share Youtube has in this area. Also you are not the average Youtube user (being on Lemmy and all) so you should think about how the average user interacts with the platform (they don’t care about Ad’s & don’t know how to install an Ad Blocker). I think Youtube can do a lot more shit before normal people would start to jump ship, but even then what are the alternatives for them? Peertube etc. don’t have the content they watch…

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure they have a huge market share. That’s simply from being the first video-sharing platform and being from Google.
          There is nothing unique or irreplaceable about them and plenty alternatives do exactly the same thing now.
          Only better without ads.
          Problem is there are too many and divide the small leftover market share between them.
          When/if that’s fixed people will not look back.
          ‘normal’ people choose VLC now and other FOSS.
          YT is not their favorite sportsteam, they have no loyalty to them.
          On the contrary. If someone insists on playing YT music for friends and it’s interrupted by an ad, everyone’s annoyed.
          And content is shared on as many platforms as they can since it’s free and they want as much viewers as possible.

    • AngryDeuce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They got me on chrome with this. I fought with it for about an hour but if I was logged in, videos just would not load.

      So back to Firefox I go wheeeee

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      you know those FBI Warnings in front of a LEGALLY (they are removed by pirates on pirated movies) procured Movie? Those are scare screens.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    You do you. I like my YT Premium. Many of the creators I watch there simply don’t publish anywhere else, and I don’t have time for ads, especially if I’m watching on my smart TV.

  • voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    hmmm? Sorry I was busy enjoying my favorite creators on invidious with sponsorskip. Not sure what you all guys are talking about. Youtube is so good when you remove Youtube from the equation.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        My friend told me that you just wouldn’t be able to download it again in the fall or something, but it’ll still work

        • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          And I avoid android like the plague; what’s your point?

          I hate when people just say “android android android”.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Weird, I’ve heard a lot of people go on about Apple. I didn’t even bring up Android, I’m not much of a fanboy for stuff like that. You asked me if I know it was for Apple, and I said I don’t know. Maybe look it up?

            • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Weird, I’ve heard a lot of people go on about Android (when it comes to YouTube and ads).

              • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                So because your algorithm is cooked you’re mad at me for saying I don’t know how to put a program on an apple phone, and yelled at me about Android even though I didn’t even bring it up?

                Like, seriously, why take it personally that I don’t like a thing you like? I didn’t say you were bad for liking apple. I didn’t rage out about you asking.

  • djdarren@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    With the glorious return of Tom Scott, I finally signed up to Nebula yesterday, and am pleasantly surprised at how many of my YT regulars are already on there. £30 for a year, no ads, and an Apple TV app.

    Which is £30 more than I paid YouTube, because the family plan is a ridiculous amount of money.

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s referring to the “you can’t block ads on YT or we might ban you” popups you get on YT occasionally, if you’re using an adblocker. I have only had it happen once or twice before I did a quick online search and found an extra filter or two to add to uBlock Origin, and then I stopped seeing them.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wonder how much time their devs spend working on a new ad block detector scheme that gets shown to a couple dozen people before ublock origin adds it to the default filters and none of their users see it again.

        I wonder if they get frustrated or just laugh and get back to the endless job. Or if they also write some of the ublock filters themselves.

        • Inucune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is a cold war happening in the background of the internet. If the advertising industry wins, everybody loses. Advertisement is intrusive by design.