Of all generational cohorts, older millennials are most likely to generate enough income to retire comfortably, according to the latest Vanguard Retirement Readiness report.

Specifically, millennials aged 37-41 have the greatest chance of landing a comfortable retirement.

  • bluGill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of things are much better. It is easy to focus on the negative without realizing how bad the past really was, or for that matter how hard things were for those in the past. sure some things are worse today - work on fixing them - bit overall things are still very good.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No they aren’t. Stop shilling. Any response that isn’t “student loan debt has been taken away, all housing prices are at the level of the early 1980s, the ceo-to-worker compensation level is the same as 1953, we have Medicaid for all, and the government is out of debt” will be discarded.

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like what specifically? Are you factoring in what things might look like in the coming decades? Or what things already look like for a majority of Americans?

      I don’t care if I can get a 4k tv for $300 if I have no emergency fund, no retirement savings and can’t cope with a medical emergency (even with insurance).

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Savings is about sacrifice for today. I personally know some who are making half a million/year who are living paycheck to paycheck, while I know others making poverty income who have growing savings. It is much easier to have a “nice” life when you have more income, but living below your means is a choice that everyone could make.

        somehow you have access to post your reply. Give up your internet and that would free up some money. I have no idea what else you do in life, but I’m sure there is a lot more.

          • Chocrates@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The toast guy is now saying that we need mass layoffs to teach us toast eaters a lesson about not asking for better wages.

        • medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Internet access is as basic a utility as electricity and water these days. It is nigh impossible to function in society without access to the internet and pretending otherwise is just oblivious to the point of petulance.

        • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Trying to understand your point here. Because I have access to an internet-connected device means that’s the reason me and others like me aren’t saving enough?

          Or maybe you meant if I have this device and I’m able to save then things aren’t as bad as they seem?

          • bluGill@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is a consequence to your choice to have internet. There is less money for other savings. Worth it is not a choice I can make for you.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      12 upvotes, 42 downvotes

      This is your punishment for trying to be positive on the internet ;-D